How long do nutrients stay in cells?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackbird3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cells
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Nutrients, specifically glucose, are processed rapidly within cells, typically remaining for less than a second before being converted into waste or utilized for energy. Elevated blood glucose levels can lead to glycosylation, which causes tissue damage, particularly in diabetics, resulting in complications such as nephropathy and retinopathy. Cells manage glucose by either burning it, converting it to glycogen, or transforming it into fat to prevent reactive damage. Excessive glucose processing is linked to mitochondrial damage, supporting the "mitochondrial theory of aging."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cellular metabolism and nutrient processing
  • Knowledge of glycosylation and its effects on health
  • Familiarity with the role of mitochondria in energy production
  • Basic concepts of diabetes and its complications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of glycosylation and its impact on cellular health
  • Explore the "mitochondrial theory of aging" and its implications for longevity
  • Study the effects of high-calorie diets on mitochondrial function
  • Investigate strategies for managing blood glucose levels in diabetic patients
USEFUL FOR

Health professionals, researchers in cellular biology, nutritionists, and individuals interested in diabetes management and aging processes.

blackbird3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Nutrients in cells question??

This question may again be too technical but does anyone now how long nutrients used for 'fuel' remain in cells (when they're not being stored - I believe they're only stored in muscle, fat and liver tissue)? For example, if a glucose molecule enters a cell from the blood stream, will it be converted into waste and leave the cell within seconds, or hours or days or longer?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Normally, not very long - on the order of less than a second, probably.

This is a backwards way of looking at it: glucose can react with other molecules and damage them. Glycosylated hemoglobin is an example.
Diabetics in poor control have higher than normal blood glucose levels. Long term, these patients develop problems like nephropathy, retinopathy... etc.
This is tissue damage. It is at least partially due to elevated blood glucose levels. Glycolsylation is not a good thing.

Running this forward now: if glucose were "safe" to have running loose in large quantities inside a cell, there would be no problems like the ones described above. So, (being anthropomorphic) the cells have to deal with glucose in a timely way - either burn it, pack it into glycogen, or turn it into fat. Fat and glycogen are not reactive like glucose.

Leaving glucose running around loose for several minutes is not a good option, from the cell's point of view.

There is considerable evidence that lab animals fed a diet too high in calories show more internal mitochondrial damage than animals fed a diet that is just barely sufficient calorie-wise. This damage to the mitochondrion is because it has to deal with extra glucose processing, it is assumed.

...The "mitochondrial theory of aging"

Ignore the plug for the pills - this is meant for non-technical folks to read.

http://juvenon.com/science/overview.htm There are some citations on other pages linked to this one
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K