How Many 100W Bulbs Can Be Powered by Converting Water's Potential Energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating how many 100W light bulbs can be powered by converting the gravitational potential energy of 180,000 kg of water dropped from a height of 50 m. The potential energy calculated using the formula Ep = mgh results in 90,000,000 J, with half converted to electric energy, yielding 45,000,000 J. By considering a flow rate of water falling over one hour, the total power output is determined to be 12,500 W, allowing for the conclusion that 125 bulbs can be lit (12,500 W / 100 W).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (Ep = mgh)
  • Basic knowledge of power and energy conversion (1 watt = 1 joule/second)
  • Familiarity with unit conversions involving time and energy
  • Ability to perform calculations involving mass, height, and gravitational acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about energy conversion efficiency in hydroelectric systems
  • Research the principles of gravitational potential energy in physics
  • Explore the relationship between power, energy, and time in electrical systems
  • Investigate practical applications of potential energy in renewable energy sources
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, engineers in renewable energy, and anyone interested in understanding energy conversion and electrical power generation.

ROCKSTAR99
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
OP warned about not using the template
Could anyone help me with this sum - To generate electricity, 180000 kg water is dropped from a height of 50 m (let g = 10 m/s^2). If half the gravitational potential energy is converted to electric energy, how many 100 W bulbs can be lit ?

Formula - Ep = mgh

I calculated the potential energy to be 90000000 J. Half of it is electric energy = 45000000 J. I am at a loss from here.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ROCKSTAR99 said:
I calculated the potential energy to be 90000000 Js. Half of it is electric energy = 45000000 Js.
The units don't work. Energy should be in joules. You will also need a time so you can convert the power consumption of the light bulbs into a total energy consumption.
 
DrClaude said:
The units don't work. Energy should be in joules. You will also need a time so you can convert the power consumption of the light bulbs into a total energy consumption.

So, is the question wrong ?
 
ROCKSTAR99 said:
I calculated the potential energy to be 90000000 Js. Half of it is electric energy = 45000000 Js. I am at a loss from here.
why not use the conversion table of watt and joule? one joule per second is equal to one watt!
when water is coming down -it should have some rate of flow - so you should not write Js only -whether s is for time or its joules?
 
ROCKSTAR99 said:
So, is the question wrong ?
Not necessarily. It is not very well formulated, but there are different ways of coming up with a reasonable answer.
 
drvrm said:
why not use the conversion table of watt and joule? one joule per second is equal to one watt!
when water is coming down -it should have some rate of flow - so you should not write Js only -whether s is for time or its joules?

s is for seconds
 
DrClaude said:
Not necessarily. It is not very well formulated, but there are different ways of coming up with a reasonable answer.

Lets say 180000 kg of water fall per hour. Now, can we find an answer ?
 
ROCKSTAR99 said:
s is for seconds

does it mean joule in a second then it is J s^-1 or J/s -it means the rate of flow is there -then you can convert directly to watt and calcilate number of light bulbs.
 
ROCKSTAR99 said:
Lets say 180000 kg of water fall per hour. Now, can we find an answer ?
Yes. You first need to figure out how much gravitational potential energy there is in that mass of water.
 
  • #10
drvrm said:
does it mean joule in a second then it is J s^-1 or J/s -it means the rate of flow is there -then you can convert directly to watt and calcilate number of light bulbs.

Using the mgh formula, I multiplied 180000 kg, 50 m and 10 m/s^2. It gave 90000000 kgm^2/s^2. I made a mistake, kgm^2/s^2 equals just Joules and there is no seconds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: drvrm
  • #11
ROCKSTAR99 said:
Using the mgh formula, I multiplied 180000 kg, 50 m and 10 m/s^2. It gave 90000000 kgm^2/s^2. I made a mistake, kgm^2/s^2 equals just Joules and there is no seconds.
Correct. Now you need to convert it to power, using the assumption you have made about the rate of flow.
 
  • #12
DrClaude said:
Correct. Now you need to convert it to power, using the assumption you have made about the rate of flow.

Ok, so 90000000 J is converted to 45000000 J of electric energy. As 1 watt = 1 joule per second, 45000000 J/ 3600 s gives 12500 W. So, is the answer 125 bulbs (12500 W/ 100 W) ? If it is, Thanks a lot.
 
  • #13
ROCKSTAR99 said:
Ok, so 90000000 J is converted to 45000000 J of electric energy. As 1 watt = 1 joule per second, 45000000 J/ 3600 s gives 12500 W. So, is the answer 125 bulbs (12500 W/ 100 W) ? If it is, Thanks a lot.
That sounds fine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ROCKSTAR99

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K