How many capybaras does it take to move a Stonehenge rock?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a hypothetical scenario of determining how many capybaras would be needed to move a sarsen rock weighing 25 metric tons to the site of Stonehenge. Participants explore various scientific principles related to physics, soil mechanics, and animal physiology, aiming to engage younger students in STEM concepts through this unusual question.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant discusses measuring the resistant force of a sarsen stone against the ground, questioning how to account for potential soil displacement and friction.
  • Another participant suggests that ground traction depends on soil conditions and the shear strength of the soil, noting that pushing a rock may not be effective compared to pulling it.
  • A later reply proposes using the soil's shear strength to assess how much stress the soil can bear without breaking, raising questions about its applicability when pulling the rock.
  • One participant mentions the use of tree trunks as rollers to facilitate moving the rock, emphasizing the mechanics of traction and movement.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of dynamic forces in pile driving, suggesting that vibration can aid in moving heavy objects.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of the example, with one participant questioning whether it is a wise choice for a presentation aimed at younger students.
  • Discussion includes a calculation method for estimating the number of capybaras needed based on contact areas, while also acknowledging the need for adjustments and considerations of capybara movement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanics of moving the rock, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the specific calculations involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal method for determining the number of capybaras needed.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of soil mechanics, the assumptions about the rock's interaction with the ground, and the physiological capabilities of capybaras. The discussion does not resolve how these factors interrelate in the context of the hypothetical scenario.

enigmaticbacon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Struggling with how to measure the resistant force of a 25 metric ton stone with the ground.
I’m writing a presentation for younger students explaining how science can help them satiate their curiosity in a fun way. This presentation’s goal is to apply as much science as possible to a ridiculous question in hopes of promoting STEM fields. My example is, how many capybaras --the world’s largest rodent-- would it have taken to push a sarsen rock (25 metric tons) to the site of Stonehenge. Where I'm struggling is how to measure the resistant force of a sarsen stone with the ground. If the surface were rigid, I could just calculate the normal force and multiply it by a friction coefficient. But how would I know if the rock would break through the surface of the ground? If it did break through, how would I go about measuring friction at that point? Would it be a function of dirt displaced?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
enigmaticbacon said:
Where I'm struggling is how to measure the resistant force of a sarsen stone with the ground.
Ground traction or drag depends on the soil conditions and shear of the soil. A tractor tire has a large contact patch, so a large shear surface area is available to handle greater tractive forces. Each capybara would need to get it's spread-out claws into the soil, to provide the area of ground contact needed for traction.

It is sometimes impossible to push a rock across a soil, the rock must be pulled. That is because the pull force will have an upward component, lifting the rock, while at the same time increasing tractor downforce and so traction. A pushed rock sinks into the soil, as the rock sinks, the push force becomes more vertical and buries the rock deeper, reducing traction to zero, as it lifts the tractor off the ground.

To move a 25 tonne sarcen, two tree trunks, would be laid down as rails ahead of the rock. The rock would be moved on three or more tree trunks, used as rollers, running across those rails, over the soil.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bandersnatch and enigmaticbacon
Ahhh so to see how much stress soil could carry without breaking, I would use the soil's shear strength? Would that also apply were the rock to be pulled?
 
Thanks!
 
enigmaticbacon said:
TL;DR Summary: Struggling with how to measure the resistant force of a 25 metric ton stone with the ground.

I’m writing a presentation for younger students explaining how science can help them satiate their curiosity in a fun way.
You have chosen a particularly difficult example that brings in physiology and numerous complications and caveats. So many complications that fatigue sets in before you get to the basic physics. Are you sure this is a wise choice?
 
enigmaticbacon said:
Would that also apply were the rock to be pulled?
Push or pull only differ when the connection is not horizontal. If there is a vertical component to the connection, either the capybaras, or the rock will have an upward component. The rock must be lifted if it is to move, as then the capybaras will push down, which will increase their traction.
 
Baluncore said:
Ground traction or drag depends on the soil conditions and shear of the soil.
If this is your limiter, then the calculation is simple. The rock has a contact area. The capybaras feet have contact area. Divide rock contact area by capybara feet contact area, and the result is the number of capybara needed. Multiply by a factor of at least 1.1, then round up to nearest integer. Keep in mind that capybara have four feet, and can pull in spurts with all four or by walking (steady motion) with two at a time.

Need an emoticon for "only slightly tongue in cheek".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K