How many functions satisfy this set of conditions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conditions for functions defined by the equations f(xy) = f(x) + f(y) and f(a) = 1. It is established that while infinitely many functions satisfy the first condition, the second condition restricts the solution to a unique logarithmic function, specifically log_a. The approach involves defining a new function F(x) = f(e^x) to leverage Cauchy's functional equation, which aids in proving the uniqueness of the logarithmic function under certain continuity conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cauchy's functional equation
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with real-valued functions and their domains
  • Concept of continuity in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Cauchy's functional equation and its implications
  • Study the properties of logarithmic functions in various bases
  • Explore the role of continuity in determining function uniqueness
  • Investigate the axiom of choice and its impact on functional equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying functional equations, and anyone interested in the properties of logarithmic functions and their applications in abstract algebra.

AdrianZ
Messages
318
Reaction score
0
How many functions satisfy this set of conditions? 1) f(x.y) = f(x) + f(y). 2) f(a)=1.
I was trying to define a logarithmic function abstractly as a map from R+ to R satisfying those 2 conditions that this question came to my mind. It's obvious that there are infinitely many functions satisfying the 1st condition (each logarithmic function in an arbitrary base satisfies the first condition). but I hope that the 2nd condition could be used to prove that only one fixed function satisfies both conditions (namely, I want to prove that only loga satisfies both conditions and then I'll use this idea to abstractly define the map loga: R+ -> R).
Is there any way to prove or disprove this conjecture? I've been trying to prove it from tomorrow morning and have failed so far. my idea is to define h(x) = f(x) - g(x) where f and g are functions with the same domain satisfying those 2 conditions and then to show that h(x)=0 for all x's in the domain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you require of your function f? I'm assuming it is real-valued, but what set is it from? You example of log is just a function \mathbb{R}^+ \to \mathbb{R}. Are we just looking for a function A \to \mathbb{R} where A is any set of real numbers that contains a and is closed under multiplication? Furthermore do you require f to be continuous?

One approach you may try is to define F : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} by
F(x) = f(e^x)
F will then satisfy Cauchy's functional equation (look it up on e.g. Wikipedia if you have never heard of it) which should help you conclude some stuff about the solutions. In particular if you require some nice conditions like continuity at a point you will get a unique solution, but otherwise you will have an infinite family of solutions.
 
If you are using the axiom of choice there are infinitely many and all of them except log are really horrible. You probably want some other condition on f. Many would work but the standard choice is
for all 0<x,y
1) f(x.y) = f(x) + f(y). 2) f'(1)=1.
There is only one such function f(x)=log(x)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K