How many kilocalories per gram are there in a 5.00-g peanut?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Per
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the kilocalories per gram in a 5.00-g peanut using calorimetry principles. The heat lost by the peanut, calculated as Q_nut = 1.15 × 10^5 J, translates to 5.49 kcal/g. A misunderstanding arose regarding the role of the calorimeter, specifically the inclusion of the aluminum container in the heat transfer calculations. Clarification was provided that the calorimeter is considered ideal, meaning it conserves energy within the system, which includes both the water and the aluminum container.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calorimetry principles
  • Knowledge of heat transfer calculations
  • Familiarity with the concept of specific heat capacity
  • Basic proficiency in thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of calorimetry and its applications in food science
  • Learn about specific heat capacity and its calculation methods
  • Explore the concept of energy conservation in thermodynamic systems
  • Study the methods for calculating energy content in food items
USEFUL FOR

Students in chemistry or food science, educators teaching calorimetry, and anyone interested in understanding energy content in food through calorimetry methods.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Conservation of energy
For this,
1680400542713.png

The solution is,

1680400350012.png

However, I am not sure why they did part(a) like that. I thought we would do it like this:

##Q_{nut} + Q_{w} = 0## since calorimeter is ideal so energy is conserved in the nut-water system
##Q_{nut} =-Q_{w}##
##Q_{nut} = -(0.500)(4184)(54.9) = -1.15 \times 10^5 J##

Therefore, the heat lost by the nut is ##Q_{nut} = 1.15 \times 10^5 J = 27.45 \frac{kcal}{5.00g} = 5.49 \frac{kcal}{g}##

However, I don't understand their method for part(a), is there a mistake in mine?Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you misunderstood the measurement. For part (a) you generate heat ##Q## by burning 5 g of peanuts. The peanut at this point is gone but the heat is not. The heat is used to raise the temperature of two things, the water and the aluminum container which together form the calorimeter. It is these two that are assumed isolated from the rest of the world so that the heat ##Q## that is pumped into them goes into raising their common temperature by 54.9 °C. You misunderstood in what way the calorimeter is "ideal."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and member 731016
kuruman said:
I think you misunderstood the measurement. For part (a) you generate heat ##Q## by burning 5 g of peanuts. The peanut at this point is gone but the heat is not. The heat is used to raise the temperature of two things, the water and the aluminum container which together form the calorimeter. It is these two that are assumed isolated from the rest of the world so that the heat ##Q## that is pumped into them goes into raising their common temperature by 54.9 °C. You misunderstood in what way the calorimeter is "ideal."
Thank you for your reply @kuruman!

That is very helpful. I did not realize that the calorimeter included the aluminum container, so using my method I should have done ##Q_{nut} + Q_{w} + Q_{A1} = 0##
 
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and member 731016
kuruman said:
Yes.
Thank you for your help @kuruman!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and kuruman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K