How many scientific people use Linux?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dE_logics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linux Scientific
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of Linux among scientific professionals, highlighting various distributions such as Gentoo, Fedora, Red Hat, and Ubuntu. Users express preferences for specific tools like OpenFOAM, Kile, Grace, and Octave for scientific computing. The conversation emphasizes the balance between performance and usability, with many users favoring Gnome over KDE for its reliability. Additionally, the challenges of software support for tablets and the need for robust package management systems are discussed, particularly in the context of Ubuntu and Arch Linux.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Linux distributions such as Gentoo, Fedora, and Ubuntu
  • Understanding of scientific tools like OpenFOAM, Kile, and Octave
  • Knowledge of desktop environments, specifically Gnome and KDE
  • Basic command line skills for package management and system configuration
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the installation and configuration of Gentoo for optimized performance
  • Explore the features and capabilities of OpenFOAM for computational fluid dynamics
  • Learn about the Arch User Repository (AUR) and its benefits for package management
  • Investigate alternatives to Microsoft OneNote for Linux that support tablet functionality
USEFUL FOR

Scientific researchers, software developers, and IT professionals seeking to optimize their Linux environment for computational tasks and improve their workflow with scientific tools.

  • #31
dE_logics said:
No, situations have changed now...things are very stable and fast I have to say (though maintainers are missing for a few packages like Recoll, kat and chrome)...I've been on Gentoo since 3 weeks and no problems yet. Problems come when you start tweaking for best possible speed...for e.g I just tweaked my Kernel configuration and now I cannot mount FAT file systems...can only do it as root...god knows what's even the Gentoo forum people can't help.

I do not find the compilation times a problem...I do something else while it compiles...so it doesn't matter.

The catch with Gentoo is that to make it work well, you need to configure it well...USE flags are the critical part...so I have ~170 use flags set, so I get a faster system...aaa...the CFLAGS hardly matter unless you're on a unique processor.

I was wondering Gentoo should start hosting it's binary package...portage can install binaries.


Anyway, I will try arch and if I find it faster, I will switch; but for a year I am most probably with Gentoo.

BTW I have just ~8 months experience with Linux...that too in Ubuntu.
Gentoo is as stable as you make it to be. Used to be that messing with CFLAGS was a really popular option (setting things like -03 and -funrollallloops, etc.), that may have changed. And I also was using it before the binary installer (so it took something like a week to install and get set up, by the time you were done getting everything working anyway). I just no longer have the patience for compiling my apps; when I install something, I usually want it pretty quickly so I can work on something, or mess around or w/e. Waiting an hour doesn't really appeal to me.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
(setting things like -03 and -funrollallloops, etc.)

Did you apply these flags?...or do you think they work?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
688
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K