How much energy does it take to make fissile material?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sillycow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Material
AI Thread Summary
The energy required to create fissile material, particularly for reactor-grade (3% enriched) and weapons-grade (90% enriched) uranium, is significant but not a large fraction of the energy produced by the fuel. The Megatons to Megawatts program successfully converted Russian weapons-grade HEU into low-enriched uranium for U.S. nuclear power plants, demonstrating effective non-proliferation and energy generation. The energy cost for enrichment is typically less than 5% of the total operational cost of a nuclear power plant. The efficiency of energy generation from nuclear bombs varies widely, making it difficult to determine if the energy input for separation exceeds the energy yield. Overall, the relationship between energy input and output in nuclear processes involves numerous variables that complicate straightforward comparisons.
sillycow
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Does it take more energy to build a nuclear bomb?
All those certifuges must eat up a lot of power!

How much energy does it take to create fissile material?

What is the ratio of energy that it takes to make reactor grade material (3% enriched) to the amount it generates?

What is the ratio for weapons grade material (90%)?

Does it take more energy to create a nuclear bomb than the yield of said bomb?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Tangentially, from 1993 to 2013 half of the reactor fuel used in the US wasn't enriched ore; it was downblended Soviet weapons pits. Of course that material had been enriched previously, but to me that's a "sunk cost."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megatons_to_Megawatts_Program
"The Megatons to Megawatts program was initiated in 1993 and completed on schedule in December 2013. A total of 500 tonnes of Russian warhead grade HEU (equivalent to 20,008 nuclear warheads) were converted in Russia to nearly 15,000 tonnes tons of LEU (low enriched uranium) and sold to the US for use as fuel in American nuclear power plants. The program was the largest and most successful nuclear non-proliferation program to date. The first nuclear power plant to receive low-enriched fuel containing uranium under this program was the Cooper Nuclear Station in 1998. During the 20-year Megatons to Megawatts program, as much as 10 percent of the electricity produced in the United States was generated by fuel fabricated using LEU from Russian HEU."
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
sillycow said:
Summary:: Does it take more energy to build a nuclear bomb?

All those certifuges must eat up a lot of power!

How much energy does it take to create fissile material?

What is the ratio of energy that it takes to make reactor grade material (3% enriched) to the amount it generates?

What is the ratio for weapons grade material (90%)?

Does it take more energy to create a nuclear bomb than the yield of said bomb?
One would need to determine the energy required for a separative work unit (SWU) and the number of SWUs for a given enrichment.

https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Separative_work_unit
One estimate: 1 kg SWU for 50 kWhr

https://urenco.com/swu-calculator
http://web.mit.edu/22.812j/www/enrichment.pdf
 
Some reactor types use natural uranium, with proper moderation and no isotope separation.
Pu can be and often is produced in natural U reactors, with no energy input into isotope separation and energy produced as side product of breeding.
 
Thanks for the answers.
What about weapons grade material? (the second part of the question).
Does it generate more energy than what it took to separate it?
 
sillycow said:
What about weapons grade material? (the second part of the question).
Does it generate more energy than what it took to separate it?
That is harder to answer because it depends on how it is used. The efficiency (yield) of fission explosions is highly variable. The fission explosion might be used to trigger a fusion explosion. In some military uses, weapons grade, or highly enriched, fuel can be use in reactors rather than bombs. Reactors might be retired before they run out of fuel.

IMO there are too many variables for a simple answer. So let's say maybe.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top