How Much Energy Was Lost to Friction for a Falling Satellite?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the energy lost to friction for a 500 kg satellite falling from a circular orbit at 500 km altitude, impacting the Earth at 2000 m/s. The energy transformation is analyzed using the equation Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf + loss, where Ki represents initial kinetic energy, Ui is initial potential energy, Kf is final kinetic energy, and Uf is final potential energy. A participant points out an error regarding the inclusion of the factor of 1/2 in the expression for Uf, indicating a need for clarity in the energy equations used in orbital mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy equations
  • Familiarity with orbital mechanics and satellite motion
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Ability to perform calculations involving gravitational constants and mass
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of energy conservation in orbital mechanics
  • Study the effects of air resistance on satellite motion
  • Learn about the gravitational constant and its application in energy calculations
  • Explore advanced topics in satellite dynamics and decay due to atmospheric drag
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in satellite dynamics and energy loss due to friction in orbital mechanics.

Sheneron
Messages
360
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 500 kg satellite is in a circular orbit at an altitude of 500km above the Earth's surface. Because of air friction, the satellite eventually falls to the Earth's surface where it hits the ground with a speed of 2000 m/s. How much energy was transformed to internal energy by means of friction.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf loss

-\frac{\frac{1}{2}GM_SM_E}{Ri} = \frac{1}{2}M_SV_f^2 - \frac{\frac{1}{2}GM_SM_E}{Rf}+ loss

-\frac{\frac{1}{2}(6.67e-11)(500)(5.98e24)}{6.37e6 + 500,000} - \frac{1}{2}(500)(2,000)^2 +\frac{\frac{1}{2}(6.67e-11)(500)(5.98e24)}{6.37e6} = loss
Is this how to go about this problem, or did I miss a concept at the beginning? thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this the right process?
 
Hi Sheneron,

I don't believe the factor of 1/2 should be in your expression for Uf.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K