How Is Energy Transformed in a Satellite's Decaying Orbit Due to Air Friction?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy transformations of a satellite in a decaying orbit due to air friction. The original poster presents a problem involving a 500-kg satellite at an altitude of 500 km, questioning the energy transformed into internal energy as it descends and impacts the Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculations of potential and kinetic energy, questioning whether all energy transformations have been accounted for. There is a focus on the potential energy change as the satellite descends and how it relates to the kinetic energy just before impact.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants prompting the original poster to consider the potential energy change during the satellite's descent. There is an exploration of the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy, particularly regarding the assumptions made about energy conversion during the fall.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining the assumptions regarding energy conservation and transformation in the context of orbital mechanics, particularly in relation to air friction and the energy states of the satellite at different points in its descent.

Zynoakib
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 500-kg satellite is in a circular orbit at an altitude of
500 km above the Earth’s surface. Because of air friction,
the satellite eventually falls to the Earth’s surface,
where it hits the ground with a speed of 2.00 km/s. How
much energy was transformed into internal energy by
means of air friction?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Total Energy of satellite = PE = KE
= G(mass of satellite)(mass of Earth)/ - 2 (Earth's radius + orbit's height)
= -1.45 x 10^10 J

KE before crash = 0.5 (500)(2000)^2 = 1 x 10^9 J

Energy loss due to friction

- 1.45 x 10^10 - 1 x 10^9 = 1.55 x 10^9 J

But the answer is 1.58 x 10^9 J, what is missing?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you account for all the energy? What about the potential energy change from orbit to surface?
 
gneill said:
Did you account for all the energy? What about the potential energy change from orbit to surface?

Why do I need to include PE change? Shouldn't all the PE energy be converted to KE right before it crashes? So the PE change will be included into KE.
 
Zynoakib said:
Why do I need to include PE change? Shouldn't all the PE energy be converted to KE right before it crashes? So the PE change will be included into KE.
PE will be changed to KE continuously as the object changes its radial position. The KE it gains as a result must figure into what remains at the end of its journey.

Suppose we consider a slightly different situation. Suppose an object with the same mass as the satellite is momentarily stationary above the surface at the same height as the satellite orbit and falls straight down to the surface. Ignoring air friction, what will be its KE and velocity at impact? Where did that KE come from? It's initial orbital KE was zero...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zynoakib

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K