MHB How Much Equity Is Needed for Buying a Second Property?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tumeke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property
AI Thread Summary
To buy a second property valued at $600,000, a 35% deposit of $210,000 is needed, while maintaining 20% equity in the first property worth $550,000. The discussion revolves around calculating the necessary increase in the first property's value to meet these financial requirements. It is clarified that the first property must be worth enough to allow a maximum mortgage of 80%, ensuring 20% equity is retained. The current value of the first property is already sufficient to meet the deposit requirement for the second property without needing an increase in value.
tumeke
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello all - I am after a little help and was hoping I could find the answer here!

A property is worth $550,000 and the bank requires 20% equity is kept in the house.
To buy a second property (say $600,000 for arguments sake) the bank requires a 35% deposit. I want to calculate how much I need the first house price to increase by to maintain 20% equity and also gain the 35% deposit required for the new house. I can do this by trial and error, but would love a method by which I could punch in a house price and it told me how much I needed the initial property to be worth to maintain 20% in it while also having 35% of the second property.

Thanks in advance.
Patrick
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tumeke said:
Hello all - I am after a little help and was hoping I could find the answer here!

A property is worth 550,000 dollars and the bank requires 20% equity is kept in the house.
To buy a second property (say 600,000 dollars for arguments sake) the bank requires a 35% deposit. I want to calculate how much I need the first house price to increase by to maintain 20% equity and also gain the 35% deposit required for the new house. I can do this by trial and error, but would love a method by which I could punch in a house price and it told me how much I needed the initial property to be worth to maintain 20% in it while also having 35% of the second property.

Thanks in advance.
Patrick
I have removed the dollar signs because this board interprets them as beginning and ending a math formula.
 
tumeke said:
A property is worth 550,000 dollars and the bank requires 20% equity is kept in the house.

To buy a second property (say 600,000 dollars for arguments sake) the bank requires a 35% deposit.

I want to calculate how much I need the first house price to increase by to maintain 20% equity and also gain the 35% deposit required for the new house.

I can do this by trial and error, but would love a method by which I could punch in a house price and it told me how much I needed the initial property to be worth to maintain 20% in it while also having 35% of the second property.
That's all quite unclear...

Can you provide a full example...
 
OK sorry if it was unclear. I should have included an example.
House one cost 550,000 and I have to maintain 20% equity at all times. So 110,000 at current levels, 115,000 if the value rises to 575,000 etc.
I want to buy house two for 600,000 and require a 35% deposit, being 210,000.
If house one rose in value to 796,000 I would maitain 20% equity (159,000) while also having the 35% deposit required for house 2 (210,000).
I'm after a formula where I can put in a value of house two and it tells me the value house one would need to have to maintain 20% equity while providing the 35% deposit.

Thanks again
Patrick
 
"House one cost 550,000 and I have to maintain 20% equity at all times.
So 110,000 at current levels, 115,000 if the value rises to 575,000 etc."

What does "20% equity" mean?
Maximum mortgage of 80%?
If house paid, you'd have 100% equity?

"I'm after a formula where I can put in a value of house two and it tells
me the value house one would need to have to maintain 20% equity
while providing the 35% deposit"

You've lost me...again!
 
Here is my interpretation: you need to take 210,000 out of the first house in order to buy the second house. The bank requires that you take no more than 80% out of the first house (leaving 20% equity). So you need the first house to be worth "W" with 0.80W= 210,000. W= 210,000/0.80= 262500. The first house is currently worth 550,000, that is already enough. It does not need to increase in value. 80% of 550,000 is $440,000l, more than 210,000.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top