How much matter can you put in space and time?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limits of matter and energy density in space and time, particularly in relation to black hole formation and the implications of General Relativity (GR). Participants explore theoretical boundaries, mathematical formulations, and the nature of singularities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the maximum density before collapse into a black hole can be expressed mathematically, with a specific inequality relating density to mass and radius.
  • Others argue that the Schwarzschild solution provides a framework for understanding the relationship between mass and the radius of a black hole, suggesting it sets an upper limit on mass density.
  • A later reply questions the invariance of the quantity of mass and expresses frustration over the lack of a direct answer, indicating a desire for clarity beyond references to external sources.
  • One participant conjectures that the maximum density might be the Planck density, although they acknowledge the absence of proof and the instability of such small black holes due to Hawking radiation.
  • It is noted that GR theoretically allows for infinite density at the singularity of a black hole, but this is accompanied by the caveat that the laws of physics as currently understood do not apply at that point.
  • A participant mentions the Bekenstein bound as a relevant concept, linking it to the discussion of maximum information density in relation to black holes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of density limits and the implications of GR, with no consensus reached on a definitive answer to the original question. Multiple competing models and interpretations are present.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific coordinate charts and the unresolved nature of certain mathematical steps related to black hole formation and singularities.

zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
How much matter or energy density can be allowed in space and time before it closes in on itself?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As most things GR, this depends on a coordinate chart. One such chart is the Schwarzschild solution for an uncharged black hole without angular momentum. This relates the radius of a ball--from which a volume can be implied, to an enclosed mass. See the Wikipedia for the Schwarzschild solution relating mass to radius.

This would put an upper bound on the amount of mass a volume could contain, given the various conditions given above and within the context of classical physics.
 
Last edited:
Phrak said:
As most things GR, this depends on a coordinate chart. One such chart is the Schwarzschild solution for an uncharged black hole without angular momentum. This relates the radius of a ball--from which a volume can be implied, to an enclosed mass. See the Wikipedia for the Schwarzschild solution relating mass to radius.

This would put an upper bound on the amount of mass a volume could contain, given the various conditions given above and within the context of classical physics.

I researched the whole page and I found no direct answer. Shouldn't the actually quantity be invariant? Why can't you just tell me instead of telling me to go look it up?
 
zeromodz said:
How much matter or energy density can be allowed in space and time before it closes in on itself?

A lot depends on what you mean by time and space closing in on itself. If you mean what is the maximum density (p) you can have in a spherical region of space before it collapses into a black hole then the answer is:

[tex]p < \frac{3}{32} \, \frac{c^6}{\pi G^3M^2}[/tex]

It can be seen that from the inequality that the larger the mass, the lower the required density to form a black hole. The converse is that the smaller the radius of the enclosing volume, the greater the density required to to form a black hole and the question becomes how small can the radius of the event horizon of a viable black hole be? Some would conjecture the maximum density would be very roughly the Planck density (a Planck mass contained within a sphere of Planck radius) but there is no real proof of this. It can be also be noted that such a small black hole would evaporate very quickly due to Hawking radiation and so it could not be called stable.

From another point of view, the general consensus is that GR allows all the mass of a fully formed black hole to be contained within a point of zero volume and therefore GR allows the density of the singularity at the centre of a black hole to be infinite, but it is also acknowledged that the laws of physics (as we know them) break down at the black hole singularity and so we do not really know what happens there.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K