1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

How much more math/physics do I need to learn before I can read this article?

  1. Apr 24, 2012 #1
    Specifically what Physics subjects and what mathematical techniques come into play that I would need to learn in order to comprehend it?

    I am currently in sophomore level undergrad physics (this year we covered waves, optics, ordinary differential equations, electromagnetism again, ect). I have taken the general (American) curriculum in math up to real analysis and abstract algebra.

    I just want to know what I would have to study because to me the ability to just grab papers off of arxiv to read would be one of the greatest pleasures ever.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 24, 2012 #2
    Which article mate?
     
  4. Apr 24, 2012 #3
    whoops! This article that I found on arxiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.0351
     
  5. Apr 24, 2012 #4
    I just took a glimpse to the paper, and it seems like you need tensor analysis, functional analysis, differential geometry/topology (I see a lot of references from Kirillov) and just by the title I'd also go with 'advanced quantum field theory'. So to answer your question: 'quite a lot'. Bear in mind that arXiv articles are normally aimed for specialists in their own fields, it's hard to try and understand them while doing one's bachelor.

    Also, I think it might be more sensible to study the subjects themselves by their own, instead of studying sub-parts of each subject just to understand the article.
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2012
  6. Apr 24, 2012 #5
    Dear Red,
    it makes me think of a related question: where to find articles that are suitable for undergraduate reading?
    Best regards,
    Desordre.
     
  7. Apr 24, 2012 #6
    You can certainly find some articles in arXiv aimed for bachelor students (normally, such articles are titled like 'introduction to...'). But preferably, if you want to see some 'new' research being done in the paper, it might be better to search for papers written by other undergraduates. Of course, I don't know you, but you are probably interested in a particular field of physics and maybe you are member of a seminar group, etc. In this case, you can ask your professor for suitable papers to read. I know my bachelor supervisor gave me papers to read from the 70s and I much enjoyed reading them with my basic knowledge of differential geometry and lie algebras.
    Sometimes, it is also a good idea to just grab a bachelor/master thesis and read it, for they tend to be self-contained and try to explain the mathematical preliminaries needed to understand the thesis. You should be able to find an archive of bachelor/master thesis in your dept. website. The downside to this is that you don't get to do exercices! and it is always important to do problems by oneself to really master a subject. However, if you want to get a 'general picture' of the subject, it is still recommendable to just read them.
     
  8. Apr 24, 2012 #7
    Dear Red,
    actually, I'm coming from an unrelated field directly to the core (or must I say, hardcore) of pure maths. So, for the time being, I am not part of any group, something I miss. But the idea of "introduction to" and undergrad papers is cool. I will look for that.
    Best wishes,
    Ds.
     
  9. Apr 25, 2012 #8
    It looks like first year graduate student stuff. By the time you finish your undergrad, you should know enough so that parts of the article will make sense.

    Standard undergraduate physics curriculum should make the article partly comprehensible.

    The important mathematical concepts are:

    1) green functions
    2) functional analysis

    The important physics concepts are:

    1) partition functions
    2) action principle
    3) some general relativity
     
  10. Apr 25, 2012 #9
    Probably you'd do well to attend a journal club, especially one in which people are presenting results to people in other areas of physics.

    One issue is that articles aren't set up for teaching purposes. I'm pretty sure that you could take the article that the OP brought up, and then "gloss" it so that it's comprehensible to junior level undergraduate physics majors, although I don't know of anyone that is doing anything like that. Journal clubs are the closest thing I can think of to a gloss.
     
  11. Apr 25, 2012 #10
    Dear Twofish,
    actually, I'm not looking for articles with a pedagogical scope, but rather to understand how do someone do write a paper in the mathematical field.

    The idea of a journal club is interesting. I must look for some or other related gatherings.

    Best regards,
    Ds.
     
  12. Apr 25, 2012 #11
    You can think of journal articles as parts of a conversation. If you are in a foreign country and someone in a restaurant says something to you, you don't know how to reply. Once you understand the language, and someone says something, then you can usually think of something that you also want to say in response.

    That's why it's useful to "gloss" an actual research article. Once you understand what the conversation is about, and you've mastered the language, you can say something in reply.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: How much more math/physics do I need to learn before I can read this article?
Loading...