I How much number crunching is necessary in some simulations?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter lpetrich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simulations
AI Thread Summary
Simulations in astrophysics, such as cosmological structure formation and galaxy collisions, require extensive computational resources, often utilizing massively parallel systems. These systems consist of thousands of interconnected computers, each handling a segment of the simulation to solve complex problems efficiently. For instance, the Illustris Simulation was executed on 8,192 compute cores, consuming 19 million CPU hours, translating to approximately three months of processing time. This collaborative approach allows for detailed modeling of phenomena like planetary system formation and black hole inspirals. The need for significant CPU cycles and memory underscores the complexity of accurately simulating cosmic events.
lpetrich
Science Advisor
Messages
998
Reaction score
180
I've seen simulations like these, simulations that were done in *very* gory detail, and simulations that apparently required a large number of CPU cycles and a large amount of memory space.
  • Cosmological structure formation and galaxy formation
  • Collisions of galaxies
  • Formation of planetary systems and collisions of planets
  • Inspiral of black holes or neutron stars
Does anyone have any more details on any of that? Like what computers that they used and how long that they needed for a run.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Almost all of these simulations are done on massively parallel systems of computers. Each computer is similar to the one in your laptop, but there are many thousands of them connected together. The problem is then split into pieces so that each computer is just solving a piece of the problem. In the cosmological structure simulations, each computer is working on a small volume of space, and the computers send information back and forth about what happens on the boundaries so the simulation can be stitched together into the whole volume. The Illustris Simulation, for example, states that "The largest was run on 8,192 compute cores, and took 19 million CPU hours". If you divide this out, it must have taken about 3 months of elapsed time running on 8192 computers.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Back
Top