How much statistical mechanics is enough for a physicist?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Understanding statistical mechanics is essential for studying advanced topics such as Quantum Field Theory (QFT), astrophysics, and black hole thermodynamics. Key resources include Tong's notes, Berkeley Statistical Physics by Reif, and the many-body formulations discussed in P. Danielewicz's papers. The discussion emphasizes that while there is no definitive endpoint to learning statistical mechanics, foundational texts like Landau & Lifshitz and Kardar's "Statistical Physics of Particles" are recommended for deeper comprehension. The necessity of statistical mechanics spans various fields, including condensed matter, nuclear physics, and cosmology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Basic understanding of statistical mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of many-body physics, including Matsubara and Schwinger-Keldysh formulations
  • Experience with foundational texts such as Berkeley Statistical Physics by Reif
NEXT STEPS
  • Study P. Danielewicz's papers on Quantum Theory of Nonequilibrium Processes for advanced insights
  • Explore Landau & Lifshitz's Volume 10 on kinetic theory for a deeper understanding of statistical mechanics
  • Read Kardar's "Statistical Physics of Particles" for a concise overview of key concepts
  • Investigate the applications of statistical mechanics in astrophysics and cosmology through relevant literature
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students, and researchers interested in QFT, astrophysics, and black hole thermodynamics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those seeking to solidify their understanding of statistical mechanics.

accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
How much statistical mechanics do I need to know to study QFT, astrophysics, black hole thermodynamics, and other advanced topics? And where should I study it in your opinion? So far I have only read Tong's notes however I don't think it is enough. Some quantum statistical mechanics is also covered in Ballentine's book that I just finished studying.
I am aware of the fact that statistical mechanics is a vast subject that reaches up to the chemistry/physics of matter and I would not like to get lost in details and applications that are too specific to these fields.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's never "enough" statistical mechanics ;-)). In astrophysics you need it for sure, and you can learn a great deal more on QFT when you also consider the many-body version in both the Matsubara imaginary time and the Schwinger-Keldysh real-time formulation for equilibrium and the latter also for off-equilibrium theory. Despite the vast applications in all of physics from condensed matter, via nuclear and particle to astronomy (physics of compact stars, the nuclear equation of state, neutron-star mergers/kilonovae) and cosmology (thermal evolution of the universe, nucleosynthesis, CMBR,...) it's also a good addition for the conceptual understanding of (relativistic and also non-relativistic) QFT.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, WernerQH, Lord Jestocost and 3 others
Because "how much" and "how little" are the same question, these questions can be restated as "what is the minimum I can get away with?"

That tends not to be an attitude leading to success,
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mathguy_1995, jim mcnamara, vanhees71 and 1 other person
vanhees71 said:
There's never "enough" statistical mechanics ;-)). In astrophysics you need it for sure, and you can learn a great deal more on QFT when you also consider the many-body version in both the Matsubara imaginary time and the Schwinger-Keldysh real-time formulation for equilibrium and the latter also for off-equilibrium theory. Despite the vast applications in all of physics from condensed matter, via nuclear and particle to astronomy (physics of compact stars, the nuclear equation of state, neutron-star mergers/kilonovae) and cosmology (thermal evolution of the universe, nucleosynthesis, CMBR,...) it's also a good addition for the conceptual understanding of (relativistic and also non-relativistic) QFT.
I just finished studying Berkeley Statistical Physics by Reif. Some things I already knew, from Tong's notes. What should I study to get on with statistical mechanics at an appropriate level in your opinion? I saw that there are various statistical mechanics textbooks, what do you recommend and what are the differences?
For example, Kardar's "Statistical Physics of Particles" is much shorter than books by Reif, Huang, Landau or Pathria, why? Which book (or notes) can help me understand the topics you mentioned and the ones I mentioned? Thank you
 
It depends a bit on what topic you are most interested in. Landau & Lifshitz is excellent, particularly Vol. 10 about kinetic theory. For the real-time formalism a very good intro is

P. Danielewicz, Quantum Theory of Nonequilibrium Processes
I, Ann. Phys. 152, 239 (1984),
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(84)90092-7

P. Danielewicz, Quantum Theory of Nonequilibrium Processes
II. Application to Nuclear Collisions, Ann. Phys. 152, 305
(1984), https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(84)90093-9

For the relativistic case

J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale, Finite-Temperature Field Theory;
Principles and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2
edn. (2006).

N. P. Landsmann and C. G. van Weert, Real- and
Imaginary-time Field Theory at Finite Temperature and
Density, Physics Reports 145, 141 (1987),
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(87)90121-9
 
  • Care
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn and accdd
I think the links you recommended are too advanced for me.
I am starting to study QFT, but I am also interested in astrophysics, cosmology, and black holes. In general, I am interested in a statistical mechanics book that will allow me to understand graduate level physics.
My current level is: notes by Tong + Berkeley Statistical Physics by Reif (the small book, which is introductory level)
 
I think the "little Reif" (Berkeley Physics Course volume on Stat. Phys.) is very good, and also Tong's lecture notes are.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
650
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K