How much statistical mechanics is enough for a physicist?

In summary: But in order to get a good understanding of the material, you should also read some of the more advanced books on the subject.
  • #1
accdd
96
20
How much statistical mechanics do I need to know to study QFT, astrophysics, black hole thermodynamics, and other advanced topics? And where should I study it in your opinion? So far I have only read Tong's notes however I don't think it is enough. Some quantum statistical mechanics is also covered in Ballentine's book that I just finished studying.
I am aware of the fact that statistical mechanics is a vast subject that reaches up to the chemistry/physics of matter and I would not like to get lost in details and applications that are too specific to these fields.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There's never "enough" statistical mechanics ;-)). In astrophysics you need it for sure, and you can learn a great deal more on QFT when you also consider the many-body version in both the Matsubara imaginary time and the Schwinger-Keldysh real-time formulation for equilibrium and the latter also for off-equilibrium theory. Despite the vast applications in all of physics from condensed matter, via nuclear and particle to astronomy (physics of compact stars, the nuclear equation of state, neutron-star mergers/kilonovae) and cosmology (thermal evolution of the universe, nucleosynthesis, CMBR,...) it's also a good addition for the conceptual understanding of (relativistic and also non-relativistic) QFT.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, WernerQH, Lord Jestocost and 3 others
  • #3
Because "how much" and "how little" are the same question, these questions can be restated as "what is the minimum I can get away with?"

That tends not to be an attitude leading to success,
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mathguy_1995, jim mcnamara, vanhees71 and 1 other person
  • #4
vanhees71 said:
There's never "enough" statistical mechanics ;-)). In astrophysics you need it for sure, and you can learn a great deal more on QFT when you also consider the many-body version in both the Matsubara imaginary time and the Schwinger-Keldysh real-time formulation for equilibrium and the latter also for off-equilibrium theory. Despite the vast applications in all of physics from condensed matter, via nuclear and particle to astronomy (physics of compact stars, the nuclear equation of state, neutron-star mergers/kilonovae) and cosmology (thermal evolution of the universe, nucleosynthesis, CMBR,...) it's also a good addition for the conceptual understanding of (relativistic and also non-relativistic) QFT.
I just finished studying Berkeley Statistical Physics by Reif. Some things I already knew, from Tong's notes. What should I study to get on with statistical mechanics at an appropriate level in your opinion? I saw that there are various statistical mechanics textbooks, what do you recommend and what are the differences?
For example, Kardar's "Statistical Physics of Particles" is much shorter than books by Reif, Huang, Landau or Pathria, why? Which book (or notes) can help me understand the topics you mentioned and the ones I mentioned? Thank you
 
  • #5
It depends a bit on what topic you are most interested in. Landau & Lifshitz is excellent, particularly Vol. 10 about kinetic theory. For the real-time formalism a very good intro is

P. Danielewicz, Quantum Theory of Nonequilibrium Processes
I, Ann. Phys. 152, 239 (1984),
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(84)90092-7

P. Danielewicz, Quantum Theory of Nonequilibrium Processes
II. Application to Nuclear Collisions, Ann. Phys. 152, 305
(1984), https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(84)90093-9

For the relativistic case

J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale, Finite-Temperature Field Theory;
Principles and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2
edn. (2006).

N. P. Landsmann and C. G. van Weert, Real- and
Imaginary-time Field Theory at Finite Temperature and
Density, Physics Reports 145, 141 (1987),
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(87)90121-9
 
  • Care
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn and accdd
  • #6
I think the links you recommended are too advanced for me.
I am starting to study QFT, but I am also interested in astrophysics, cosmology, and black holes. In general, I am interested in a statistical mechanics book that will allow me to understand graduate level physics.
My current level is: notes by Tong + Berkeley Statistical Physics by Reif (the small book, which is introductory level)
 
  • #7
I think the "little Reif" (Berkeley Physics Course volume on Stat. Phys.) is very good, and also Tong's lecture notes are.
 

1. What is statistical mechanics?

Statistical mechanics is a branch of physics that uses statistical methods to explain the behavior of large systems of particles, such as molecules in a gas or atoms in a solid. It is based on the principles of thermodynamics and probability theory.

2. Why is statistical mechanics important for physicists?

Statistical mechanics allows physicists to understand and predict the macroscopic behavior of systems based on the microscopic properties of their constituent particles. It is essential for studying complex systems, such as gases, fluids, and solids.

3. How much statistical mechanics is typically covered in a physics degree?

The amount of statistical mechanics covered in a physics degree can vary depending on the program, but it is typically introduced in undergraduate courses and expanded upon in graduate-level courses. It is an important topic in many areas of physics, including thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and condensed matter physics.

4. Can statistical mechanics be applied to other fields besides physics?

Yes, statistical mechanics can be applied to other fields, such as chemistry, biology, and economics. It provides a framework for understanding the behavior of complex systems and can be used to make predictions and analyze data in these fields.

5. Is it necessary to have a deep understanding of statistical mechanics to be a successful physicist?

While a strong understanding of statistical mechanics is beneficial for physicists, it is not necessary to have a deep understanding of it to be successful. Many physicists may use statistical mechanics as a tool in their research, but may not specialize in it. It is important to have a basic understanding and be able to apply its principles in various areas of physics.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
767
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
692
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
854
Back
Top