How much time do you have to make the same measurement?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the timing of repeated measurements in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the evolution of a quantum state as described by Schrödinger's equation. Participants explore the implications of measurement outcomes, the nature of quantization, and the conditions under which identical results can be obtained.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a second measurement of a particle's observable property, such as spin, can yield the same outcome if performed quickly.
  • Another participant counters that immediate repetition of a measurement does not guarantee identical results, particularly for measurements with continuous outcomes like position or momentum.
  • It is noted that for projective measurements with discrete outcomes, immediate repetition may yield the same result, but the system will evolve under its Hamiltonian if not measured immediately.
  • A distinction is made between two definitions of "quantized," one relating to classical versus quantum observables and another regarding the description by quantum mechanics.
  • Concerns are raised about the influence of the system's evolution on the measurement parameters, emphasizing that this influence varies depending on the system.
  • One participant discusses the mathematical expression for the time evolution of energy components in a quantum state, suggesting that if the time interval is small relative to the energy components, the state remains approximately unchanged.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of repeated measurements and the conditions under which they yield identical results. There is no consensus on the implications of continuous versus discrete outcomes in quantization.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on the definitions of quantization and the specific conditions of the quantum system being measured, indicating that the discussion is nuanced and context-dependent.

quantumfunction
Messages
59
Reaction score
4
As I undersand it, if you make a measurement on particle and get some observable property like spin, you can quickly make a second measurement and get the same outcome. How long do you have to make that second measurement before it starts evolving according to Schrödinger's equation and you don't know if you will get the same outcome or not.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It isn't true in general that an immediate repeat of a measurement will yield an identical result.

It is true for projective measurements with discrete outcomes, which is what is usually described in textbooks. For measurements with continuous outcomes, such as a measurement of position or momentum, it is not possible for immediate repetition to yield an identical result.

In the case where an identical result is possible, one must make the repeat immediately, otherwise the system will evolve under its Hamiltonian (Schroedinger's equation) to a state that is not an eigenstate of the observable that was measured.

In the special case in which the eigenstate of the measured observable is also an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, then one can measure at any later time to get the identical result.
 
Thanks for the answer @Science advisor, that clears things up. Ihave a question.

If this is the case, does this mean measurements with continuous outcomes are not quantized?
 
There are two definitions of "quantized".

In one, it means the classical observables are continuous, while the quantum observables are discrete. Energy is quantized in this sense, while position is not quantized in this sense.

However, another meaning of quantized means "described by the quantum mechanical formalism". In this sense, a quantum particle that can have position as a continuous observable is quantized.
 
quantumfunction said:
before it starts evolving according to Schrödinger's equation
It always does that (even during your measurements, but it could get disturbed by this measurement). The question is "how strong is the influence of this evolution on the parameter you measure" and that depends on the system.
 
quantumfunction said:
How long do you have to make that second measurement before it starts evolving according to Schrödinger's equation and you don't know if you will get the same outcome or not.
The energy components of your state evolve in time with e^{\frac{-i E_n t}{\hbar}}
So if t \ll \frac{\hbar}{E_n} for all energy components of the state, the exponentials are approximately zero and your state stays approximately the same between time 0 and time t. That's what can be said in general. As mfb said, the rate of change of the parameters you measure in the second measurement are important.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K