How Much Warmer Is Water at the Bottom of Niagara Falls?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackflub
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impossible
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the temperature difference of water at the top and bottom of Niagara Falls, specifically focusing on the energy transformations involved in the fall of water from a height of 50.6 meters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of energy principle, discussing the relationship between thermal energy and potential energy. Questions arise regarding the role of kinetic energy during the fall and its conversion to heat upon impact.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations related to the temperature change, while others express uncertainty about the implications of kinetic energy in the context of the problem. There is an acknowledgment of the specific heat capacity of water, but no consensus has been reached regarding the overall energy dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the disregard for evaporation effects and highlight the age of the thread, indicating a long-standing interest in the topic.

blackflub
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
i can't even figure out where to start with this one

The water going over Niagara Falls drops 50.6 m. How much warmer is the water at the bottom of the falls thatn it is at the top? Disregard any possible effects of evaporation of water during the fall.

any help would be appreciated and the final answer is .118 C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is conserved:

\Deltathermal + \Deltapotential = 0

mc \Delta T + mgh = 0

Factor out the m

(4187) \Delta T + (9.8)(-50.6) = 0

\Delta T = 0.1184
 
thanx soo much i guess i thought it was soo hard that i believed myself
 
the unsettling thing is, what about the kinetic energy?
 
What kinetic energy? The water as it falls, increases speed (so kinetic energy also) as it loses potential energy. However, when it hits the bottom, it stops going down! There will be some small motion of water but it will be so turbulent that eventually it will be converted to heat. In the long run all the energy is converted to heat.
 
where did u get 4187?
 
joehoy41 said:
where did u get 4187?

The c term, the specific heat capacity of water in J/(kg.K).

BTW, this thread is nearly 8 years old!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K