How Much Work Is Needed to Pull a Hanging Chain Onto a Table?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NAkid
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to pull a hanging chain back onto a frictionless table. The chain has a length of 1.30m and a mass of 2.6kg, with one-fourth of its length hanging over the edge. The initial attempt at calculating work using the formula W=FΔX yielded an incorrect result due to the non-constant force as the chain is pulled. Participants emphasized the need for integration to account for the changing force and suggested using energy methods to determine the work done by considering the change in gravitational potential energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (PE) concepts
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in physics
  • Knowledge of linear density and its application in mass calculations
  • Basic principles of force and work in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to apply integration to calculate work done by variable forces
  • Study gravitational potential energy changes in dynamic systems
  • Explore linear density calculations and their implications in physics problems
  • Investigate energy methods for solving mechanics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those tackling mechanics problems involving forces, work, and energy, as well as educators looking for effective teaching methods in these topics.

NAkid
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] this should be really easy but..

Homework Statement


A chain is held on a frictionless table with one-fourth of its length hanging over the edge, as shown in the figure. If the chain has length L = 1.30m and mass m = 2.6kg, how much work is required to pull the hanging part back onto the table?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


ΔX=1.3*.25=.325
mass=2.6
g=9.8
F=m*a
W=FΔX
W=(2.6)(9.8)(.325)=8.281J


not the right answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
should i not assume that the mass of the chain is evenly distributed over the length of the chain?
 
NAkid said:

The Attempt at a Solution


ΔX=1.3*.25=.325
mass=2.6
g=9.8
F=m*a
W=FΔX
W=(2.6)(9.8)(.325)=8.281J


not the right answer
Since the force is not constant, to use this method you'd need to integrate. (The integration is easy though.) Why not use energy methods instead? How does the gravitational PE change?
 
NAkid said:
should i not assume that the mass of the chain is evenly distributed over the length of the chain?

Yes, you should. But you can't use F*dx to get the work, since F isn't constant. As more of the chain is pulled onto the table F decreases. So you want to write F as a function of x, the amount of chain left hanging, and then integrate F(x)*dx.
 
so, integrate (2.6/1.3)dx from 0 to .325?
 
wait no that would be if the mass wasn't distributed evenly, never mind.
 
NAkid said:
wait no that would be if the mass wasn't distributed evenly, never mind.

The overhanging mass is the density of the chain times x. What other factor do you need to get a force?
 
using energy methods, i have W=mgy1-mgy2
you're lifting from y1=-.325 to y2=0
is the mass proportional to the chain or is it constant?
 
Last edited:
The overhanging mass is the density of the chain times x. What other factor do you need to get a force?

you need acceleration..
 
  • #10
NAkid said:
using energy methods, i have W=mgy1-mgy2
you're lifting from y1=-.325 to y2=0
is the mass proportionate to the chain or is it constant?
Hint: Consider the part initially hanging. Where's the center of mass of that piece? How does it change when the chain is pulled up? (Alternatively, what's the average distance that the hanging mass elements must be raised?)

The mass of any piece of chain is proportional to its length.
 
  • #11
NAkid said:
The overhanging mass is the density of the chain times x. What other factor do you need to get a force?

you need acceleration..

You need g. Integrate g*density*x*dx from 0.325 to 0. Using energy is also instructive. See if you get the same thing.
 
  • #12
hm, integral of (9.8xdx) from .325 to 0 = .517, which is not what the answer i should get
 
  • #13
NAkid said:
hm, integral of (9.8xdx) from .325 to 0 = .517, which is not what the answer i should get

Put in the density. (I omitted that when I first posted).
 
  • #14
ah ok, i thought there was something missing, density = mass/volume --> 2.6/...?
 
  • #15
Linear density. (total mass)/(total length).
 
  • #16
never mind ---- got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
114
Views
16K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K