How often do you need to refresh your memory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andytoh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Memory Refresh
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the retention of mathematical knowledge after studying topics that are rarely used, such as ring theory and group theory. Participants express varying degrees of memory retention, noting that while some concepts may be forgotten shortly after learning, others can be recalled with some review. The consensus suggests that memory retention is influenced by the depth of understanding and personal interest in the subject. Many agree that it is unrealistic to expect to remember every detail without reference materials, highlighting the importance of textbooks for refreshing knowledge. There is also a distinction made between students and professors regarding memory usage; students may need to recall more frequently, while professors often remember only what is relevant to their research. Overall, the conversation emphasizes that continual engagement with mathematical topics enhances memory retention, but complete recall without reference is generally not feasible.

How often do you need to refresh your memory for a topic you rarely use?

  • Twice a year

    Votes: 10 50.0%
  • Once a year

    Votes: 8 40.0%
  • Once every 2 years

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • Once every 3 years

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Once every 4 years

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Once every 5 years

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I never forget any math topic I learn!

    Votes: 1 5.0%

  • Total voters
    20
andytoh
Messages
357
Reaction score
3
Some math topics you've studied you will rarely use again. How well do you find that you remember all the fine details of these topics that you rarely use?

By the way, I'm back after one year. Anyone miss me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How cow. I don't recognize any of the names on the online list.
 
Depends on the topic. Sometimes you never forget, sometimes I forget 5 seconds after I just used it.
 
I mean a subject that you studied as much as in an actual course (hence a course at your level at the time), did the problems, even got tested, etc... But you never used the topic ever again.

For example, suppose you just finished a course in ring theory, and you never used ring theory again. After one year, would you be able to pick up your old ring theory textbook and tackle those problems without saying "Man, I forgot all this." ?
 
Last edited:
andytoh said:
For example, suppose you just finished a course in ring theory, and you never used ring theory again. After one year, would you be able to pick up your old ring theory textbook and tackle those problems without saying "Man, I forgot all this." ?
Absolutely not. But, after reading through the relevant material I would like to think I'd be able to have a go. After all, it seems pointless trying to remember everything you've ever been taught. That's what textbooks are for!
 
who do you think we are? all enrico fermis and paul diracs and gausses?
 
The question is fairly vague. It depends on how thoroughly you cemented the math into your brain in the first place. Some things I forget in a month, others I never forget.
 
I know what you meant, and the answer is the same. In particular, it's been a year since I looked at anything to do with group theory or ring theory, and despite doing very well in both, I could remember the ring theory fine, but not the group theory at all.
 
I'll give a general answer. I may not be able to remember every fine detail about the subject, but I feel that I could read the textbook and not struggle to understand it. I think if I read a few lines here and there, it'll click again. However, unless I use it constantly, it won't be on the tip of my tongue. I find it hard to remember much about group theory, but hey partial differential equations I'm good to go! :)
 
  • #10
I'm not one for remembering -- like cristo said, that's what textbooks are for.
 
  • #11
It's pretty often for me...I usually forget things shortly after the class is over. But then there's some things that just stick. I guess it probably has a lot to do with my interest in the subject and how much I use it.
 
  • #12
Is it fair to say that students would be skewed to greater frequency and professors would be skewed to less frequency required (perhaps never needing any rereading?). If so, would you then say that having such a good memory is a big requirement for being good enough to become a researcher in the first place?
 
  • #13
Ahahah - i don't think anyone can remember everything without reference - hell i need to look through my grocerry list several times at the store even after i wrote it down and debated what i needed to get for the whole week.

No harm in refreshing your memory - doesn't make you any more special than you already are. If that was the case then Kevin Trudeau would be a nobel Laureate just because he remember phone numbers, birthdays and first names.
 
  • #14
andytoh said:
Is it fair to say that students would be skewed to greater frequency and professors would be skewed to less frequency required (perhaps never needing any rereading?). If so, would you then say that having such a good memory is a big requirement for being good enough to become a researcher in the first place?

They'll remember things in their field of research and courses they teach and that's about it.

They work on it daily. If someone worked on mathematics everyday, I'm sure they would remember it all too. Not necessarily solve anything, but they will remember it.
 
  • #15
How can anyone claim to not forget a math topic?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K