How Old Is the Tree Based on Carbon-14 Dating?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the age of a tree using carbon-14 dating, specifically analyzing the percentage of carbon-14 remaining in a sample after a volcanic eruption. Participants explore the mathematical relationships involved in the calculation, including the half-life of carbon-14.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a calculation showing that the tree is approximately 3826 years old based on the percentage of carbon-14 remaining.
  • Another participant proposes a general formula for calculating the age of the tree, emphasizing the relationship between the percentage of carbon-14 and the half-life.
  • There is a question raised about the use of variable names in the equations, specifically why 'y' is not used instead of 'a' for the age of the tree.
  • Participants confirm the calculation of age using logarithmic functions and the half-life of carbon-14.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the method of calculation and arrive at the same approximate age for the tree. However, there is a minor disagreement regarding the choice of variable names in the equations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion assumes the half-life of carbon-14 is 5700 years and relies on the percentage of carbon-14 remaining, but does not address any potential limitations or assumptions in the calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and individuals interested in carbon dating, mathematical modeling in biology, or those studying the applications of exponential decay in real-world scenarios.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\textsf{ The charcoal from a tree killed
in a vocano eruption }$
$\textsf{contained 62.8% percent of the carbon-14 found in living mater.}$
$\textsf{How old is the tree, to the nearest year? }$
$\textsf{Use $5700$ years for the half-life of carbon-14} $

$$1=2e^{k\cdot 5700}$$
$$k=-0.00012160$$

presume this is how we find $ k$
$$62.8=100e^{-0.00012160y}$$
$$y\approx 3826$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If $A$ is the age of the tree (in years), and $P$ is the percentage of the original amount of carbon-14 still present and $H$ is the half-life of carbon-14 (in years), then I would write:

$$P=100\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{\Large{\frac{A}{H}}}$$

What do you get when you solve for $A$ (which is what we're asked to find)?
 
MarkFL said:
If $A$ is the age of the tree (in years), and $P$ is the percentage of the original amount of carbon-14 still present and $H$ is the half-life of carbon-14 (in years), then I would write:

$$P=100\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{\Large{\frac{A}{H}}}$$

What do you get when you solve for $A$ (which is what we're asked to find)?
$$62.8=100\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{a/5700}$$
$$a=3826$$

why not use $y$ instead $a$?
 
karush said:
$$62.8=100\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{a/5700}$$
$$a=3826$$

What I meant was to take:

$$P=100\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{\Large{\frac{A}{H}}}$$

And solve for $A$:

$$\frac{100}{P}=2^{\Large{\frac{A}{H}}}$$

$$A=H\log_{2}\left(\frac{100}{P}\right)$$

Now plug in the given data (we have a general formula now for other problems):

$$A=5700\log_{2}\left(\frac{100}{62.8}\right)\approx3826$$

karush said:
why not use $y$ instead $a$?

Whatever you choose is fine. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
14K