How Old Is the Wood Sample Based on Carbon-14 Decay?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the age of a wood sample using carbon-14 decay, focusing on the application of the first-order decay equations and the interpretation of disintegration counts from the sample compared to a modern reference.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the half-life of carbon-14 is 5730 years and discusses the implications of this for calculating the age of the wood sample based on disintegration counts.
  • Another participant provides the decay constant calculation as k = 0.693/5730 = 1.21x10-4, suggesting this is a straightforward calculation.
  • A question is raised about what values to use for At and A0, specifically whether these refer to the number of disintegrations.
  • A participant confirms that the ratio of activities, which relates to the number of disintegrations, is the correct approach to take.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of the decay equations and the importance of the disintegration counts, but there is some uncertainty regarding the specific values to use for At and A0.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity on the application of the decay equations and how to interpret the disintegration counts in the context of the problem. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.

Who May Find This Useful

Students or individuals interested in nuclear decay, carbon dating, or related mathematical applications in physics and archaeology may find this discussion relevant.

plexus0208
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Background info: The first order rate of nuclear decay of an isotope depends only upon the isotope, not its chemical form or temperature. The half-life for decay of carbon-14 is 5730 years. Assume that the amount of C-14 present in the atmosphere as CO2 and therefore in a living organism has been constant for the last 50,000 years. An ancient sample containing C-14 will show fewer disintegrations of the C-14 that is present than a modern sample because the concentration of C-14 is lower in the ancient sample.

If a 1.00 gram sample of wood found in an archaelogical site in Arizona underwent 7.90x103
disintegrations in a given time period (e.g., 20 h) and a modern sample underwent 1.84x104 disintegrations in the same time period, how old is the ancient sample?

Homework Equations



First order:
ln[A]t = -kt + ln[A]o
[A]t = e-kt[A]o

ln(([A]o/2)/[A]o) = -kt1/2 = ln(1/2)
or ln2 = kt1/2 = 0.693

The Attempt at a Solution


kt1/2 = 0.693
k = 0.693/5730 = 1.21x10-4

ln[A]t = -kt + ln[A]o
ln[A]t = ?
ln[A]o = ?
Solve for t?
Is this the right equation to use?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
plexus0208 said:
kt1/2 = 0.693
t1/2 = 0.693/5730 = 1.21x10-4

t1/2 is given, simple mistake here.

Other than that go for

\frac {A_t} {A_0} = e^{-kt}

and it becomes almost simple plug and chug.

--
 
What do I use for At and A0?
The number of disintegrations?
 
Yes. You are interested in ratio of activities.

--
methods
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K