MHB How old until Bala's father is three times older

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnx1
  • Start date Start date
Johnx1
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Bala is 11 years old. His father is 37 years old. In how many years' time will Bala's father be three times as Bala.

My answer:

Bala = B
Father = F

so,

B = 11
F = B + 26
F = 3B

=>3B = B + 26
= B = 13

So, the answer is when bala is 13 and the father is 39.However, when I did it in a different way, where I did F = 48 - B, I get a difference answer.

Is the first way how I did it mathematically correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Johnx said:
Bala is 11 years old. His father is 37 years old. In how many years' time will Bala's father be three times as Bala.

Johnx said:
My answer:

Bala = B
Father = F
so,
B = 11
F = B + 26
F = 3B
=>3B = B + 26
= B = 13
So, the answer is when bala is 13 and the father is 39.

However, when I did it in a different way, where I did F = 48 - B, I get a difference answer.
Is the first way how I did it mathematically correct?

Yes, because the difference between the two ages is 26 no matter the value of B. So all you really need is

F = B + 26
F = 3B

=>3B = B + 26
= B = 13

Since 13 - 11 = 2 the answer to the original problem is "In 2 years time Bala's father will be three times as old as Bala."

Another method would be solving 3(11 + x) = 37 + x for x.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top