MHB How old until Bala's father is three times older

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnx1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Bala is currently 11 years old, and his father is 37 years old, creating a 26-year age difference. To determine when Bala's father will be three times his age, the equation 3B = B + 26 is used, leading to the conclusion that this will occur when Bala is 13, which is in 2 years. The mathematical approach confirms that in 2 years, Bala will be 13 and his father will be 39. An alternative method using the equation 3(11 + x) = 37 + x also leads to the same conclusion. Thus, Bala's father will be three times his age in 2 years.
Johnx1
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Bala is 11 years old. His father is 37 years old. In how many years' time will Bala's father be three times as Bala.

My answer:

Bala = B
Father = F

so,

B = 11
F = B + 26
F = 3B

=>3B = B + 26
= B = 13

So, the answer is when bala is 13 and the father is 39.However, when I did it in a different way, where I did F = 48 - B, I get a difference answer.

Is the first way how I did it mathematically correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Johnx said:
Bala is 11 years old. His father is 37 years old. In how many years' time will Bala's father be three times as Bala.

Johnx said:
My answer:

Bala = B
Father = F
so,
B = 11
F = B + 26
F = 3B
=>3B = B + 26
= B = 13
So, the answer is when bala is 13 and the father is 39.

However, when I did it in a different way, where I did F = 48 - B, I get a difference answer.
Is the first way how I did it mathematically correct?

Yes, because the difference between the two ages is 26 no matter the value of B. So all you really need is

F = B + 26
F = 3B

=>3B = B + 26
= B = 13

Since 13 - 11 = 2 the answer to the original problem is "In 2 years time Bala's father will be three times as old as Bala."

Another method would be solving 3(11 + x) = 37 + x for x.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top