How painful is it to die from acute radiation poisoning?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Absolute
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pain and suffering associated with dying from acute radiation poisoning, particularly in the context of historical events like the Chernobyl disaster and the Manhattan Project. Participants explore the duration of suffering, the lethal doses of radiation, and the physiological effects of such exposure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about the pain involved in dying from acute radiation poisoning, questioning how long it takes to die and what amounts of radiation are lethal.
  • One participant mentions that the duration of suffering can vary, citing cases from the Manhattan Project where individuals took weeks to die from radiation exposure.
  • Another participant suggests that severe doses can lead to the destruction of the nervous system, resulting in immediate death, while lower doses may cause significant pain and suffering.
  • There are claims that pain from radiation exposure could be worse than a severe sunburn, and that palliative care, such as morphine, would be administered at high levels of exposure.
  • Some participants note that the chances of encountering lethal radiation sources are low for the general public, with historical examples provided, such as the Goiânia accident and the Castle Bravo nuclear test.
  • Concerns are raised about the regulation of radiation sources and the potential dangers of "dirty bombs," with discussions on the fear they invoke despite the actual risks being debated.
  • Participants discuss the context of radiation exposure, including nuclear power plants, nuclear weapons, and unregulated sources used in medical treatments and industrial applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the specifics of pain and suffering from acute radiation poisoning, with various viewpoints on the duration, severity, and context of exposure remaining contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the variability in individual responses to radiation exposure, the dependence on dosage, and the lack of consensus on the exact nature of pain experienced. There are also references to historical incidents that illustrate the complexities of radiation safety and exposure.

  • #31
I believe that several elements contribute to the fear of radiation exposure:

First, Hormesis is not a sure thing, so if you survive the acute phase, you may well be living with the Sword of Damocles called cancer. Second, there is the "walking ghost" phase for higher doses, properly the latent phase, which is spooky on a basic level. We don't want to die, but we especially don't want to see our deaths coming, having had a taste of the pain to come. Finally, you can't see it, you can't smell it, or fight it, and that scares people. For the average person, germs and radiation are about as scary as scary gets, even if they are more likely to die with a broiling engine block in their lap.

This being said, in terms of pain experienced, compared to some forms of late stage cancers, burns, systemic infection, and a number of other ways to die, radiation poisoning is not the most painful by any measure. Remember though, that we fear death, but we especially fear DYING. The anticipation of death, and the pain to come that has already been felt during the acute phase, and will return after the latent phase is surely hell. Why do we fear aircraft accidents so much? Is it a worse way to die than being shot, or a car accident, or is it that you spend you last minutes completely out of control, in horrible terror?

@Morbius: Radiation Hormesis is not confirmed, but it does seem likely. Fractional doses are clearly less immediately lethal than single large doses however. I think "avoid the blue glow" is just a good way to live.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
My job in the nuclear navy was a radiation health physicist. It's been several years so my estimates might be a little off, but in the ballpark.

22-24 Rem is when we require medical monitoring because your blood will start to show significant mutations.

~50-100 Rem is enough you give you radiation sickness, which is a more severe version of having sun-poisoning from being outside in the summer sun too long. This is the point where you get 'sun-burned' and you begin vomiting. Death is low.

~100-300 Rem. Damage to internals becomes significant. We're usually concerned with gastric intestinal tracts (spelling?), esophagus, lungs, ect. Death is at 'I think' 40% over the course of a few weeks to a few months.

~300-500 Rem. Severe damage to internals. Death rises to 60-90% in a few days to a week or two.

>500 Rem. Death occurs at >90% in a day or two (less than a week).

I hope this helps. Just for a comparison, the average person gets ~0.4-0.6 (I can't remember if it's .35 or .6)Rem/year from the Sun. I used to take reactor samples, and had to make several emergency reactor compartment entries (@ 1 hour post shutdown), and my 'lifetime' accumulated dose was 0.100 Rem which by industry standards is considered 'high', so most other people receive way less than that; working around reactors is inherently safe with respect to day-to-day radiation accumulation. If you want a really good 'picture' of the pain involved however, in my opinion, try watching the movie "K-19: The Widowmaker" with Harrison Ford. It's a true story about a Russian nuclear submarine that develops a severe reactor plant leak/rupture and the Men that tried fixing it.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
The LD 50/30 (the lethal dose that will kill 50% of the population in 30 days with no medical treatment) is 450 REM. With medical treatments like blood transfusions and bone marrow transplants, you can survive up to about 1000 REM. Beyond 1000 REM, they can keep you alive for a while but you'll eventually die. The Shift Manager at Chernobyl got over 1000 REM the night of the accident and died about a year later. As for pain, it is not a death that I choose. Your brain swells, as do your other limbs, you vomit, etc. Exposure to several thousand REM will kill you in a matter of minutes to seconds.

I used to teach a nuclear engineering class where, to impress upon students the need to be careful, I had them calculate how long it would take them to die if a commercial nuclear power plant spent fuel bundle were to be brought to the surface of the spent fuel pool. The answer was about 0.4 seconds. A spent fuel bundle gives off about 2 million REM.

Mark Laris
Chief Nuclear Engineer
Reactor Engineering Associates
 
  • #34
mjlaris said:
The LD 50/30 (the lethal dose that will kill 50% of the population in 30 days with no medical treatment) is 450 REM. With medical treatments like blood transfusions and bone marrow transplants, you can survive up to about 1000 REM. Beyond 1000 REM, they can keep you alive for a while but you'll eventually die. The Shift Manager at Chernobyl got over 1000 REM the night of the accident and died about a year later. As for pain, it is not a death that I choose. Your brain swells, as do your other limbs, you vomit, etc. Exposure to several thousand REM will kill you in a matter of minutes to seconds.

I used to teach a nuclear engineering class where, to impress upon students the need to be careful, I had them calculate how long it would take them to die if a commercial nuclear power plant spent fuel bundle were to be brought to the surface of the spent fuel pool. The answer was about 0.4 seconds. A spent fuel bundle gives off about 2 million REM.

Mark Laris
Chief Nuclear Engineer
Reactor Engineering Associates

I think in the 1000-1500 REM range too, you have the horror of the walking ghost period. There is a lot of thinking that while people fear death, the concept of protracted horror facing an inevitable end is torment. It goes a long way to explaining why 2 minutes falling in a airplane with a rapid death at the end is seen as torturous, but being ejected from a car and lingering is less so. The fear you experience in a given situation is a function of the exotic nature of that situation, your level of control or perceived control over events, and then pain and suffering. The complete breakdown of your body's function at a cellular level followed by multiple organ failure is horrendous, painful, and out of control. I would consider it a truly gruesome way to die, and I for one would eat a gun once symptoms re-emerged after the latent phase.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
343K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K