How pick gears that will hold for given torque?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chevreuil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gears Torque
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on selecting gears for specific torque applications, emphasizing the importance of gear specifications such as gear ratio and mesh configuration. A simple method is recommended: find an off-the-shelf gear with adequate specifications. The user discovered that their initial gear was insufficient and upgraded to one with double the modulus. Key calculations for gear strength are provided, including the formula for maximum tangential force, which incorporates factors like diametral pitch (DP) and pitch factor (K).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gear ratios and mesh configurations
  • Familiarity with gear modulus and its implications
  • Knowledge of maximum tangential force calculations for gears
  • Basic proficiency in CAD software for gear design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research gear design principles using the KHK Gears guide
  • Learn about diametral pitch (DP) and its role in gear strength
  • Explore methods for calculating gear torque capacity
  • Investigate CAD techniques for accurate gear modeling
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, gear designers, and anyone involved in selecting or designing gears for torque applications will benefit from this discussion.

Chevreuil
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was wondering if anybody could recommend a simple method to pick gears for a given task. I need to make a rough estimation to see if I'm off by more or less a factor of ten. The only method I have access to is very complex and hard to understand.

Cheers
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The easy method is to find an off-the-shelf gear that has sufficient specifications for the application you have.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chevreuil
It will depend on the gear ratio and relative mesh configuration.
If the torque is countered by only one tooth then it comes down to the wheel radius and the size of the tooth as a short cantilever. Thicker gearwheels make a difference.
Give us some dimension and configuration specifications so we can be more specific.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chevreuil
Thank you all, I ended up finding that my chosen gear was too weak, and I had to go for one with twice the modulus (i.e. with the cogs about twice as large).
 
http://www.hpcgears.com/pdf_c33/27.48-27.60.pdf

In this document, it is said that the maximum tangential force, in lbs of force, that a gear can take without succumbing to wear, is

(X_c * Z * S_c * F )/K

Where X_c, Z, S_c, F is a bunch of factors derived from the gears and their working conditions. K however, is described as "Pitch factor DP 0.8 power". What does that mean? Does this mean that K=DP^(0.8)? (exponentiation with the diametral pitch as the base and 0.8 as the exponent)
 
Yes it just means DP^0.8
 
This is a more comprehensive manufacturers guide to gear design :

http://khkgears.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/gear_guide.pdf

PS: I can't see anything wrong with the gear drawings that you Emailed . Your problem may originate in some quirk of the CAD program . Best thing to do is for you to draw your own gears to the supplied dimensions . Then you can be sure that you haven't got something silly like a scaling error from your CAD's interpretation of the downloads .
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much! This guide looks great!

OT: Did you see their video ad? I'm getting really weird vibes from it, but it really gets the message delivered.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
16K