How realistic is it for me to become a physicist?

  • Context: Physics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the realism of pursuing a career as a physicist, particularly in academia. Participants explore the challenges of securing academic positions, the job market for physicists, and alternative career paths outside of academia.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the discouraging outlook for becoming a physics professor, likening it to a dream of playing in the Olympics.
  • Another participant suggests that while aiming for a professorship may limit job prospects, there are many other career paths available for physicists outside of academia.
  • Some participants highlight that graduate school can be a rewarding experience, regardless of whether one becomes an academic scientist.
  • There is a discussion about the disconnect between being a physicist and being a professor, with some arguing that many physicists work in industry and still engage in research.
  • One participant notes that the job market for physicists in academia is highly competitive, with statistics indicating that a typical professor may only replace one out of ten students they graduate.
  • Another participant references data from the APS indicating that there are more physicists in industry than in academia, suggesting a broader job market than typically perceived.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the path to becoming a physics professor is challenging and that there are many alternative career options for physicists. However, there is disagreement regarding the perceived limitations of pursuing a career solely in academia versus the opportunities available in industry.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the job market and the definitions of what constitutes a physicist's role, particularly in relation to industry versus academia.

Jow
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Recently I have been a tad depressed. Whenever I look up how to become a professor if physics I come across discouraging things. Everyone seems to say that my dream of getting a job in academia is like a dream of playing in the olympics. Unfortunately, I cannot see myself being anything but a physicist, or some sort of scientist. Are my dreams realistic? Also, I keep hearing that there are few jobs in the area of physics, is this likely to change in the next decade? I am afraid of wasting my time in graduate school if this is really unlikely.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jow said:
Recently I have been a tad depressed. Whenever I look up how to become a professor if physics I come across discouraging things. Everyone seems to say that my dream of getting a job in academia is like a dream of playing in the olympics. Unfortunately, I cannot see myself being anything but a physicist, or some sort of scientist. Are my dreams realistic? Also, I keep hearing that there are few jobs in the area of physics, is this likely to change in the next decade? I am afraid of wasting my time in graduate school if this is really unlikely.

As your posts alludes to, you seem to know that 'banking' on becoming a professor is a bad bet. Fortunately for you, though, you don't really have to decide about this for a while. I'll elaborate...

You're still in high school. The most immediate decision is where to go to college and what to study there. Since you're interested in physics, the decision (at least on what to study) is obvious. Towards graduation, you have a much better idea of if you like physics, your aptitude as a researcher, and whether or not you want to continue on to graduate school. If you choose not to, there are plenty of excellent jobs you can get with a physics B.{S,A}.

Once you get a PhD, then you have another big decision which is whether to stay in academia with postdocs and hope for a faculty appointment a few years down the road, or just altogether transition out of academia.

My point is that along the way to becoming a physics professor, there are plenty of 'stopping off' points, where you can go do something else (which in general will pay more and have more stability!). My only other advice, which should be obvious, is to be aware of this branching and not march blindly through the steps with your sights fixed solely on an academic position.
 
Grad school is the most fun I've had so far in life. Even if I don't get to become an academic scientist (or even any kind of scientist), I will always treasure this time. The pay is not the best, but to just get to learn all day...and get paid for it. You really can't beat it.
 
Jow said:
Recently I have been a tad depressed. Whenever I look up how to become a professor if physics I come across discouraging things. Everyone seems to say that my dream of getting a job in academia is like a dream of playing in the olympics. Unfortunately, I cannot see myself being anything but a physicist, or some sort of scientist. Are my dreams realistic? Also, I keep hearing that there are few jobs in the area of physics, is this likely to change in the next decade? I am afraid of wasting my time in graduate school if this is really unlikely.

There is a serious disconnect here.

Being a physicist does NOT automatically mean being a professor in physics.

If all you care about is being a physics professor, then YES, your job scope will be extremely limited.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
There is a serious disconnect here.

Being a physicist does NOT automatically mean being a professor in physics.

If all you care about is being a physics professor, then YES, your job scope will be extremely limited.

Zz.

You mistake my meaning. Yes, my ultimate goal is being a professor, but all I really care about is getting into academia and doing research of my own. Sorry for the confusion.
 
Jow said:
You mistake my meaning. Yes, my ultimate goal is being a professor, but all I really care about is . Sorry for the confusion.

Er... that is what I meant! Being a physicist does NOT just mean working in Academia! You are too restrictive in what you see as the job of a physicist! There are physicists working at INTEL, Motorola, Applied Materials, Lucent Technologies, Varian Medical Systems, etc... etc. And yes, they do research there as well.

Because of that, as I've stated, if all you care about is " ... getting into academia and doing research of my own ... " then yes, your job opportunity will be severely limited. That should address your first post.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Er... that is what I meant! Being a physicist does NOT just mean working in Academia! You are too restrictive in what you see as the job of a physicist! There are physicists working at INTEL, Motorola, Applied Materials, Lucent Technologies, Varian Medical Systems, etc... etc. And yes, they do research there as well.

Because of that, as I've stated, if all you care about is " ... getting into academia and doing research of my own ... " then yes, your job opportunity will be severely limited. That should address your first post.

Zz.

By your definition I would have many opportunities to become a physicist, and though I do consider the jobs you listed as definite options, my ideal would be to enter academia. Perhaps I should rephrase my original statement as to how realistic is it for me to want to get into academia. However, thank you for your comments. For some reason, I did not even consider the fact that I would still be doing research in positions other than those offered in academia.
 
A typical professor will graduate maybe 10 students. On average, one of them will replace him. Those are the odds.
 
ZapperZ said:
Er... that is what I meant! Being a physicist does NOT just mean working in Academia! You are too restrictive in what you see as the job of a physicist! There are physicists working at INTEL, Motorola, Applied Materials, Lucent Technologies, Varian Medical Systems, etc... etc. And yes, they do research there as well.
How many jobs like this would you estimate exist, compared to the number of physicist jobs in academia?
 
  • #10
The APS has said that the number of their members (and they cater to the academic/government sector) in industry exceeds that it academia and government (national labs, NIST, etc.).

Assuming government is 20% of academia, and industry APS members are just barely a majority, you get 2.4 industrial or government jobs per academic job. That's the floor. The professorial argument gives a ceiling around 10. It's somewhere in that range, and the exact numbers probably depends strongly on definitions. Is someone who worked for 20 years at Boeing as a physicist and now manages them a physicist? What about a university dean?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K