MHB How should I interpret a formula without brackets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samwise-zambeezi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
The formula '1.2 . h - 0.2 . x' can be interpreted as '(1.2 . h) - (0.2 . x)' based on the order of operations, which prioritizes multiplication over addition and subtraction. The use of the dot for multiplication is discouraged unless clearly defined, as it can lead to confusion. Participants emphasize the importance of clarity in mathematical notation. Overall, the interpretation aligns with standard mathematical conventions. Proper notation enhances understanding and reduces misinterpretation.
Samwise-zambeezi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have a formula which i might have expected to have brackets, but it hasn't, so i need to correctly interpret it.

Could anyone please offer any pointers as to how it should read?

The formula is '1.2 . h - 0.2 . x'

Can i assume that it should be '(1.2 . h) - (0.2 . x)'?

Thanks

Zamb
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You don't really need to "assume" that. Remember "PEMDAS" ("Please Excuse my dear aunt Sally")- Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtration. Multiplication and division have precedence over addition and subtraction.
 
Samwise-zambeezi said:
Hi all,

I have a formula which i might have expected to have brackets, but it hasn't, so i need to correctly interpret it.

Could anyone please offer any pointers as to how it should read?

The formula is '1.2 . h - 0.2 . x'

Can i assume that it should be '(1.2 . h) - (0.2 . x)'?

Thanks

Zamb
To be a bit more direct,.. Yes, that would be correct. However I still don't like it because it really reads 1*2*h - 0*2*x. Never use "." for multiplication unless you have defined it unambiguously!

-Dan
 
Hi both,

thanks a lot for your feedback, much appreciated,

Zambeezi
 

Thread 'Trigonometry problem of interest'

Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Rearranging Formulas: Finding W in Terms of M and L
Replies
5
Views
2K
A How should I write an account of prime numbers?
Replies
5
Views
2K
MHB How to Derive Answers Using N Formula
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Alternating Harmonic Numbers are cool, spread the word!
Replies
4
Views
2K
MHB Understanding Cubic Equation Formula for Polynomials of Degree Three
Replies
9
Views
3K
I Discussion on the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics
Replies
11
Views
885
MHB Pressure and Force - Fluid Dynamics
Replies
2
Views
2K
About semidirect product of Lie algebra
Replies
19
Views
3K
MHB Rearranging Formula, making x the subject from y=5(x+3)
Replies
12
Views
3K
I How to visualize the maths behind a formula?
Replies
7
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top