MHB How should I interpret this question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jameson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interpretation
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on interpreting a mathematical question that involves calculating a function for multiple variables. The initial query asks for the calculation of a function f(v1, v2, v3, p(t)), which leads to the interpretation that one should compute f for each of the values v1, v2, and v3 while incorporating p(t) into the function. The ambiguity of the question arises from its plain English phrasing, which can lead to multiple interpretations, unlike formal mathematical notation that is clearer.Further clarification is provided through a linear algebra example, where the task is to calculate the derivative of a function g raised to the power of n, applied to different expressions for f(t). Each expression represents a specific case for which the derivative is computed, demonstrating how the structure of the question can guide the interpretation of the calculations required. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clarity in mathematical language and invites further examples to explore different interpretations of similar problems.
Jameson
Insights Author
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
13
Tell me how you understand this question. I've removed the details of the calculation to focus on the language and how certain ideas should be expressed. I know it's a weird thing to ask so just try to answer how you can.

Calculate __________ for each $v_1, v_2, v_3$ and $p(t)$.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would interpret that as we are given some $f(v_1,v_2,v_3,p(t))$ and a list of possible values for the 4 independent variables for which we are to compute $f$.
 
I would interpret it as calculating some function $f(v, t)$ three times, using $v = v_1$, $v = v_2$, and $v = v_3$, with $p(t)$ being used inside $f(v, t)$. In other words, I read: Calculate $f(v, t)$ in terms of $p(t)$ for $v = v_1$, $v_2$, and $v_3$, for some $f$.​

But without the context of the actual calculation, it's hard to be certain, especially when the question is written in plain English like this. In formal notation, there would be no ambiguity, for instance, but in English, it could have many different interpretations.​
 
Great responses guys but let me rephrase a bit. I'm really focused on the structure of questions that have the form "For each _________ and __." This came from a linear algebra question so let's try this:

Calculate ________ for $1+t^2, 2-t+3t^2, 4+t$ and $p(t)$.
 
That strikes me as you are given an expression containing some $f(t)$, and the first 3 cases give you an explicit function definition for $f$, while in the last you are to use a general function. For example, suppose in a Calc I course, the student is instructed that for each given $f(t)$, that are to compute:

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(g^n(f(t)) \right)$$ and so they would do the following:

First, the student would find via the power and chain rules:

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(g^n(f(t)) \right)=ng^{n-1}(f(t))\cdot f'(t)$$

i) $$f(t)=1+t^2$$

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(g^n(1+t^2) \right)=ng^{n-1}(1+t^2)\cdot(2t)$$

ii) $$f(t)=2-t+3t^2$$

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(g^n(2-t+3t^2) \right)=ng^{n-1}(2-t+3t^2)\cdot(6t-1)$$

iii) $$f(t)=4+t$$

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(g^n(4+t) \right)=ng^{n-1}(4+t)\cdot(1)$$

iv) $$f(t)=p(t)$$

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(g^n(p(t)) \right)=ng^{n-1}(p(t))\cdot p'(t)$$
 
Your post completely answers how you interpret this, so thank you! There are two interpretations that I see and I want to give it a little more time before I explain so I'll post tomorrow and clarify what's going on. Hopefully someone else can think of another example for this problem and interpret it as he or she sees it too.

Here's one thing to ponder and again, sorry this is cryptic but I don't want to influence your thoughts too much:

Are there 4 terms or 3 terms to calculate?
 
To some degree, this thread is inspired by PF user erobz's thread "Why do we spend so much time learning grammar in the public school system?" That's why I made a title to this thread that paralleled the title of erobz's thread. I totally disagree with erobz. I created this thread because the curriculum of grammar at Universities is a totally distinct topic from the topic of the curriculum of grammar in public schools. I have noticed that the English grammar of many ( perhaps most)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
837
  • · Replies 190 ·
7
Replies
190
Views
15K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K