How Should Negative Percentages Be Written?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BWV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the appropriate way to express negative percentages for a general audience, with three suggested formats: A) "xxx declined -2%", B) "xxx declined 2%", and C) "xxx declined by 2%". Participants agree that option C is the least ambiguous. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding the audience when presenting technical information, suggesting that familiar comparisons, such as percentages, enhance comprehension for the general public. Additionally, the use of gerunds and their definitions is clarified, emphasizing the need for precise language in technical writing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of negative numbers and their representation
  • Familiarity with technical writing principles
  • Knowledge of audience analysis in communication
  • Basic concepts of gerunds and their grammatical usage
NEXT STEPS
  • Research best practices for presenting negative data in reports
  • Explore audience analysis techniques for effective communication
  • Learn about technical writing standards for scientific and engineering documents
  • Study the grammatical rules surrounding gerunds and their applications
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for technical writers, educators, communication professionals, and anyone involved in presenting data to the general public.

BWV
Messages
1,637
Reaction score
1,992
Curious on thoughts here about writing with negative numbers, i.e. do you write

A) xxx declined -2%

or

B) xxx declined 2%

this is for the general public, if that makes a difference

Argue about this at work, have not seen any style guide addressing this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think C) declined by 2% is the least ambiguous wording.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DEvens, Wrichik Basu, Rive and 4 others
I never understood the reliance on percentages to explain or describe technology and science to the general public. Perhaps people become accustomed to using percents from school grades and report cards. If real numbers are difficult for the general public to comprehend, would not graphs and related constructs provide more information and improve understanding?

Do not mean to go off topic. I agree with @fresh_42 that people generally understand negative numbers as positive integers with appropriate gerunds direction on a number line such as decline, reduce, diminish, go down; that indicate a negative.

[Edit 20200110: This thread prompted me to review how contemporary mathematics teachers describe negative integers, reals and complex numbers to a student audience as displacement or distance from the origin on number lines.

While doing so, I modified my ideas about the use of percents in technical papers. The basic rule "know your audience" applies to both fiction and non-fiction publications. In this thread the intended audience, "the general public", likely benefits from the familiar comparison of values expressed as percentages. My technical writing produced in conjunction with engineering projects and a few corporate IPO's had an intended audience of scientists, engineers and senior management, not the general public, with appropriate use of scientific notation, lists and graphs. Thanks.]
 
Last edited:
When teachers at my school used to shout that they would deduct -20 marks from the copies of students who were adopting unfair means during an exam, we always wondered why those students should be getting 20 extra marks for doing something wrong. 🤔
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, phinds, Ophiolite and 1 other person
Klystron said:
Do not mean to go off topic. I agree with @fresh_42 that people generally understand negative numbers as positive integers with appropriate gerunds such as decline, reduce, diminish, go down; that indicate a negative.
Those words aren't gerunds. A gerund is a verb used as a noun. A good discussion of what is a gerund (and of other kinds of words ending in 'ing', such as present participles) is available at https://linguapress.com/grammar/gerunds.htm
 
sysprog said:
Those words aren't gerunds. A gerund is a verb used as a noun. A good discussion of what is a gerund (and of other kinds of words ending in 'ing', such as present participles) is available at https://linguapress.com/grammar/gerunds.htm
Thanks for the information. I meant to edit my response but lacked time, as is true today.

[Edit on 20200110: corrected my previous post, one hopes, for clarity.]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
896
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
716
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K