How Similar Are the Images from BOSS and CMB Planck Spacecraft?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter exponent137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmb
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the similarities and differences between images produced by the BOSS (Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey) and the CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background) measured by the Planck spacecraft. While both images represent cosmic structures, they depict different regions in space and time, necessitating cosmological models to analyze their relationships. The primary anisotropies from the CMB do not correlate significantly with galaxy patterns, although secondary anisotropies, such as the Sunyaev–Zel'dovich effect and the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, provide some correlation. Observational effects, particularly galactic dust, can also influence CMB maps but are accounted for in BOSS data.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background) and its significance in cosmology
  • Familiarity with BOSS (Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey) and its role in mapping galaxies
  • Knowledge of secondary anisotropies, particularly the Sunyaev–Zel'dovich effect
  • Basic grasp of cosmological models and their application in analyzing cosmic data
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Sunyaev–Zel'dovich effect and its implications for CMB observations
  • Study the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and its impact on cosmic structure analysis
  • Explore the Aladin tool for visualizing SDSS catalogues over CMB maps
  • Investigate the effects of galactic dust on CMB measurements and data correction techniques
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and astrophysicists interested in the relationships between cosmic structures and the Cosmic Microwave Background, as well as researchers analyzing galaxy mapping data.

exponent137
Messages
562
Reaction score
35
In
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article...ps-1-2-million-galaxies-in-the-early-universe
we can see picture which was also measured.

One paper about this is also:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.03155v1.pdf

This picture is very similar as CMB picture measured by Planck spacecraft .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_( spacecraft )
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planc...IA16874-CobeWmapPlanckComparison-20130321.jpg

Are those two pictures really similar if we put one on another?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jerromyjon
Space news on Phys.org
Well, directly putting them on top of each other doesn't help - they are showing different regions in space. They are also showing different regions in time, so you don't get directly the same patterns - so you need cosmological models to figure out how the CMB fluctuations develop to galaxy patterns. As far as I understand the new galaxy map fits well to the models.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: exponent137
Not really. You can test this out if you install Aladin which can show an SDSS catalogue on top of a CMB map. The clustering signal in the CMB and the galaxies are related but direct correlations between the CMB and galaxies are slim. I would be careful of correlation by eye however, you usually see what you want to and the BOSS galaxies aren't that homogeneous.

There are correlations between galaxies in the modern universe and the observed CMB but these are secondary anisotropies, they were imprinted by the galaxies as the CMB light passed by. The primary anisotropy generated at the surface of last scattering won't be correlated significantly. Secondary correlations are usually quite weak. The main one is the Sunyaev–Zel'dovich effect where the CMB photons scatter off the hot electrons in the intra-cluster medium in galaxy clusters. This one can be seen by eye with either big clusters or good data as cold spots at low frequencies and hot spots at higher ones (this is a spectral distortion, the spectrum is no longer black body). However this is a very small scale effect, not visible in these images. There is a larger scale effect called in the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect where the accelerating universe causes small residual gravitational redshifts when CMB photons enter and leave a potential. The end result is that clusters leave hot spots and voids leave cold spots on the CMB. This occurs at much larger scales than the SZ effect but it is very small and can't be seen by eye, it can barely be detected statistically. There is also gravitational lensing where galaxies trace the mass in the universe which lenses the CMB. This is again small but it can dominate the very small scale CMB structures with the SZ effect but that’s not really resolved by Planck, it's best studied in polarisation.

There may however be observational effects, namely dust. Galactic dust causes reddening but it can also contaminate CMB maps, however combined CMB maps are pretty good at removing foreground away from the galactic plane and BOSS does account for reddening.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: exponent137

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K