Is there a drag on Earth caused by its motion relative to the CMB rest frame?

In summary, motion relative to the CMB rest frame causes a dipole moment in the wavelength of CMB photons, leading to a drag effect on spacecrafts. However, this effect is negligible for the Earth due to its low peculiar velocity. It may be worth considering in scenarios involving UHE cosmic rays or fast gas clouds in interstellar or intergalactic space.
  • #1
substitute materials
39
1
Motion relative to the CMB rest frame creates a dipole moment in the wavelength of CMB photons in the direction of motion. Observations suggest that the Earth has a motion relative to CMB rest frame of 600 km/s.

As indicated in this study, for a spacecraft at a speed we shall dub 'ludicrous speed', the drag from the CMB photons would become very significant, as they would be blueshifted to the point where pair production occurs. This effect also theoretically limits the energy of observed cosmic rays, or at least the distance that such cosmic rays can travel. Even before this point though, momentum will be transferred to the spacecraft , producing drag.

My question is this: Does this drag exist even at the low peculiar velocity of Earth? I imagine it is a vanishingly small force, but it does have an awful long time to act. How would one calculate the force imparted at our peculiar velocity?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Technically: Sure. The energy density is 0.25 eV/cm3. For a rough approximation, assume Earth flies through space and picks up all photons "in front of it", re-emitting the energy isotropically. That is not true as the CMB photons move around, but that will just give some prefactor not far away from 1. Then Earth feels a radiation pressure of ##0.25 \frac{eV}{cm^3} \cdot 600 \frac{km}{s} \frac{1}{c} = 8\cdot 10^{-17} Pa## or a force of 32 mN. This leads to an acceleration of 5*10-27 m/s2. If Earth would freely float through the CMB, over 10 billion years this would change the speed of it by 1.7 nanometers per second. Yeah... forget it. To make it worse, Earth is not floating freely, it orbits the Sun. The column density of Sun is larger by a factor of about 100, so the effect on Sun is even smaller by a factor 100.
 
  • Like
Likes stoomart
  • #3
The momentum of Earth is quite large compared to CMB photons and CMB photons strike Earth from all directions, not just in the direction of movement. The term 'vanishingly small' is an exaggeration when it comes to characterizing the drag on Earth due to the CMB. Rest assured solar photons would have a greater affect than CMB photons. You can play around with this calculator; http://www.georgedishman.f2s.com/solar/Calculator.html, for an idea of how much they hinder the motion of earth. Needless to say we can safely ignore that effect on Earth's orbit. It would be safe to say collisions with space debris dwarf the contributions of photons to impeding the Earth's motion.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
mfb said:
Technically: Sure. The energy density is 0.25 eV/cm3. For a rough approximation, assume Earth flies through space and picks up all photons "in front of it", re-emitting the energy isotropically. That is not true as the CMB photons move around, but that will just give some prefactor not far away from 1. Then Earth feels a radiation pressure of ##0.25 \frac{eV}{cm^3} \cdot 600 \frac{km}{s} \frac{1}{c} = 8\cdot 10^{-17} Pa## or a force of 32 mN. This leads to an acceleration of 5*10-27 m/s2. If Earth would freely float through the CMB, over 10 billion years this would change the speed of it by 1.7 nanometers per second. Yeah... forget it. To make it worse, Earth is not floating freely, it orbits the Sun. The column density of Sun is larger by a factor of about 100, so the effect on Sun is even smaller by a factor 100.

Ok, that is a very small effect indeed. Is there any scenario other than UHE cosmic rays where this drag would be worth considering? Interstellar or intergalactic dust or gas?
 
  • #5
For the cosmic rays, it is not really a drag, it is just a conversion probability.

Repeating the same approach from above with 10-20 m2 atoms of 1 u, we get 5*10-10 m/s2 or a cooling time of 40 million years (as the force is proportional to speed). I don't trust the numbers enough to say if this is lower than a billion years, but a fast gas cloud far away from galaxies might actually experience some drag over time.
 
  • #6
Thanks mfb and Chronos. I'm enjoying this lightsail calculator as well.
 

1. What is CMB drag on Earth?

CMB drag, also known as Cosmic Microwave Background drag, is a phenomenon where the cosmic microwave background radiation interacts with Earth's atmosphere and creates a drag force on the Earth. This force is caused by the transfer of momentum from the CMB photons to the air molecules in the atmosphere.

2. How does CMB drag affect Earth?

CMB drag has a very small effect on Earth, with a force of only about 1.3 × 10^-13 Newtons. This force is negligible compared to other forces acting on Earth, such as gravity and atmospheric pressure. However, it does contribute to Earth's overall motion and rotation in space.

3. Is CMB drag a new discovery?

No, CMB drag has been known to scientists for many years. It was first predicted by physicist James Peebles in the 1960s and was later confirmed by observations in the 1970s. However, ongoing research and advancements in technology have allowed for a better understanding of this phenomenon.

4. Can CMB drag be measured or observed?

Yes, CMB drag can be observed and measured through various methods. One way is through the measurement of the Earth's rotation rate, which can be affected by CMB drag. Another method is through the use of satellites and telescopes that can detect the subtle changes in the CMB radiation caused by the drag force.

5. Is CMB drag unique to Earth?

No, CMB drag is a universal phenomenon that occurs on all celestial bodies. Any object that has an atmosphere will experience some level of CMB drag, although the extent of its effect may vary depending on the object's size and atmospheric composition.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
437
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
257
Back
Top