How small could a pusher-plate spacecraft be built?

  • Thread starter Arising_uk
  • Start date
Hi All,
Not sure if this is the right section but happy if its moved by mods.

Back in the 50's Dyson and his team came up with the Orion pusher-plate spacecraft and the figures looked like it would work. Apparently it was shelved due to the nuclear testing treaty. Now in the style typical of the day they thought big so the craft would be like a flying house. What I want to know is given the advances today how small could we build a pusher-plate spacecraft?

Many thanks for any replies.
 
33,453
9,181
Everything will be possible, but smaller nukes are less efficient and smaller plates capture a smaller fraction of the explosion, so the concept becomes pointless if the spacecraft is not very large.
 
Thanks for your reply.

Given it would not be earth-launched but only used in the vacuum would this make a difference to the efficiency?
 

berkeman

Mentor
55,901
5,953
Thanks for your reply.

Given it would not be earth-launched but only used in the vacuum would this make a difference to the efficiency?
Were nuclear-explosion-powered pusher-plate designs ever envisioned for Earth-launch?
 
Yup! Dyson, et al, had worked out the maths and physics and thought the couple of lives lost to radiation a fair price to pay for such a craft. The reason it was shelved was due to the signing of the nuclear test-ban treaty. Interestingly, and according to his son, the work now appears to be being reclassified as secret by the US govt?
 
33,453
9,181
Project Orion was planned to be launched from ground.

Nuclear weapons don't care about pressure outside, so the conclusion is independent of where you use them.
 

Related Threads for: How small could a pusher-plate spacecraft be built?

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
486
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
594
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
22
Views
33K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
987
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
27
Views
7K
Top