What is the derivation of the identity (dS/dV)T=(dP/dT)V in thermodynamics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The identity (dS/dV)T=(dP/dT)V in thermodynamics is derived using the Helmholtz free energy function, F=U-TS, where U is internal energy, T is temperature, and S is entropy. By applying Clairaut's theorem on exact differentials, the relationship between entropy and volume at constant temperature can be established. The derivation involves manipulating differential forms and recognizing the appropriate thermodynamic potentials, specifically F, which is a function of temperature and volume.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic potentials, specifically Helmholtz free energy (F=U-TS).
  • Familiarity with exact differentials and Clairaut's theorem.
  • Knowledge of differential forms and their applications in thermodynamics.
  • Basic concepts of partial derivatives and their notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Helmholtz free energy and its implications in thermodynamics.
  • Learn about differential forms and their role in advanced thermodynamic analysis.
  • Explore the application of Clairaut's theorem in various thermodynamic identities.
  • Investigate the relationship between different thermodynamic potentials (U, H, F, G) and their variables.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, physicists, and engineers seeking to deepen their understanding of thermodynamic identities and their derivations.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


If dU=TdS-PdV then
(dS/dV)T=(dP/dT)V

the T and V at the end means that T and V are constant
How did they get this identity? It came from a thermodynamics hence for their notations.

I have tried ways like rearranging but it doesn't seem to work. I think it has something to do with exact differentials.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the Helmholtz function?
 
by Clairaut's theorem,
let z=z(x,y)[/tex]<br /> \left ( \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x\partial y}\right )=\left ( \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y\partial x}\right )<br /> <br /> or more explicitly, using &quot;thermodynamic notations&quot;:<br /> \left [\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left ( \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right )_y\right ]_x=\left [\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left ( \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}\right )_x\right ]_y<br /> <br /> then look at:<br /> F=U-TS<br /> <br /> dF=-SdT-PdV<br /> so F is a function of T and V, ie. F=F(T,V)[/tex] (when N is treated as a constant)
 
Last edited:
I see. The Clairaut's theorem is a formal way of stating exact differentials isn't it?

Helmholtz function is F=U-TS and sub dU=TdS-PdV and apply Clairaut's theorem.

Using F=U-TS was the important bit. The sheet didn't mention Helmoholtz anywhere so it would have been hard to know what to use in order to derive the relation. Wouldn't you say?
 
not really.. hehe, looking at the derivatives you posted. One easily notice that the variables involved are V and T.

so you should know the one thermodynamic potential that is a function of V and T. (which is F)

in general, you have
U(S,V)
H(S,P)
F(T,V)
G(T,P)

H=U+PV
F=U-TS
G=U-TS+PV

so when you see an identity, check what variables it involves and use the appropriate thermodynamic functions.
 
Last edited:
There's a neat calculation involving differential forms.
0=d(dU)=d(TdS-PdV)=dT \wedge dS+Td(dS) - dP\wedge dV-Pd(dV)=dT\wedge dS-dP\wedge dV
Then write
dS=\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V dT + \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_T dV
and
dP=\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V dT + \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial V}\right)_T dV.
Note that dT\wedge dT=0 and dT\wedge dV= - dV\wedge dT.
 
tim_lou said:
not really.. hehe, looking at the derivatives you posted. One easily notice that the variables involved are V and T.

so you should know the one thermodynamic potential that is a function of V and T. (which is F)

in general, you have
U(S,V)
H(S,P)
F(T,V)
G(T,P)

H=U+PV
F=U-TS
G=U-TS+PV

so when you see an identity, check what variables it involves and use the appropriate thermodynamic functions.

OK. But you could interchange these functions couldn't you to get them into different variables intermingled together.

robphy said:
There's a neat calculation involving differential forms.
0=d(dU)=d(TdS-PdV)=dT \wedge dS+Td(dS) - dP\wedge dV-Pd(dU)=dT\wedge dS-dP\wedge dV
Then write
dS=\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V dT + \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_T dV
and
dP=\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V dT + \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial V}\right)_T dV.
Note that dT\wedge dT=0 and dT\wedge dV= - dV\wedge dT.

What is the upside down V in the equations?
 
the notation looks insane.

just one question, why does d(dU)=0??

and I am very confused by the info from mathworld...

so
dT\wedge dS

equals what in terms of partial derivatives?

is it like a vector cross product or something like that?
suppose a=a(x,y), b=b(x,y)

what would
da\wedge db
be?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
tim_lou said:
the notation looks insane.

just one question, why does d(dU)=0??
This comes from the definition of the exterior derivative
and I am very confused by the info from mathworld...

so
dT\wedge dS

equals what in terms of partial derivatives?
Plug dS and dP into the first equation in robphy's post.
is it like a vector cross product or something like that?
suppose a=a(x,y), b=b(x,y)

what would
da\wedge db
be?

Look up the exterior derivative above.
 
  • #11
wow.. thanks for the info. differential forms are awesome! time for me to pick up a book on such topic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
28K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K