A How to add higher dimensional operator at higher energy in SM?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter zaman786
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Operator
zaman786
Messages
31
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
how to add higher dimensional operator to SM
Hi, I Learned that we can add higher dimensional operator but they are non-renormalizable - but effect of higher dimensional operator is vanishes at low energy - my question is than how can we add higher dimensional operator at higher energy - like dimension 5 operator ( weinberg operator) which is non- renormalizable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zaman786 said:
TL;DR Summary: how to add higher dimensional operator to SM

Hi, I Learned that we can add higher dimensional operator but they are non-renormalizable - but effect of higher dimensional operator is vanishes at low energy - my question is than how can we add higher dimensional operator at higher energy - like dimension 5 operator ( weinberg operator) which is non- renormalizable.
These effective operators are typically the result of integrating out some degrees of freedom at a higher scale. The actually UV complete theory can contain only d=4 operators.

As an example, for the Weinberg operator there are essentially three ways of UV completing the theory:
  • With SM singlet fermions - aka right-handed neutrinos.
  • With a SU(2) triplet scalar.
  • With a SU(2) triplet fermion.
These are the type I, type II, and type III seesaw mechanisms. When you integrate out any of these from the theory, you obtain the Weinberg operator as the d=5 operator (and other operators at higher d).
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top