How to apply Nemtab cross section library into PARCS?

Thread starter annakaka
Start date Jul 31, 2025

AI Thread Summary

In the discussion about applying the Nemtab cross section library into the PARCS neutronics code, a beginner seeks guidance on integrating Nemtab data. The user notes that PARCS allows for cross section data input through the XSEC card or the PMAXS in the DEPL card. They possess a Nemtab library with various branches for different fuel temperatures and coolant densities but are unsure whether to input it directly or convert it into PMAX files. Participants are encouraged to share their experiences or solutions regarding this integration challenge. The conversation focuses on the technical aspects of using cross section data in PARCS effectively.

Jul 31, 2025

annakaka

Hello everyone, I am a beginner for PARCS neutronics code. In PARCS we have 2 ways to set the xs data. One is in the XSEC card and the other is using PMAXS in DEPL card. Now I have nemtab xs library with many braches of different Fuel temperatures and Coolant densities. I am confusing that is there a way a can put nemtab directly to PARCS input or do I have to convert nemtab into PMAX files. Please let me know if anyone have experience this issue. Thank you very much!

Thread 'MCNP Code Error -- Need to find the cause of the error'

c Code for bare 252Cf at 100 cm from source c cell cards 10 1 -15.1 -101 $ Cf Source Cell 11 2 -8.0 -102 101 $ Stainless-Steel 12 3 -2.699 102 -103 $ Aluminium Pipe 13 4 -1 -104 #10 #11 #12 $ Detector Cell 14 4 -0.001205 -129 #10#11#12#13 $ Air 15 0 129 $ Outside World c surface cards 101 rcc 0 0 0.98 0 0 -1.96 0.47 102 rcc 0 0 5.5 0 0 -11 2.25...

View full post »

Thread 'Energy Spectrum Attenuation'

Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

View full post »