How to Approach Buoyancy Force in Fluid Mechanics Homework?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving a fluid mechanics homework problem involving buoyancy force, specifically calculating the buoyancy force acting on a submerged oak buoy and a steel weight. The key equations used include the force balance equation F - W1 - W2 = 0, where F is the buoyancy force, W1 is the weight of the submerged oak, and W2 is the weight of the steel. Participants clarify the importance of using specific gravity to find weights and densities, emphasizing the need to convert specific gravity to density using the formula ρ = 1000 * SG. The final solution for the height of the submerged portion of the oak buoy is determined to be 0.53 m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy force and Archimedes' principle
  • Familiarity with specific gravity and its conversion to density
  • Knowledge of force balance equations in fluid mechanics
  • Basic proficiency in using the metric system (MKS units)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Archimedes' principle in fluid mechanics
  • Learn how to calculate buoyancy forces for different shapes and materials
  • Explore the relationship between specific gravity and density in various contexts
  • Investigate the effects of fluid density on buoyancy in different liquids
USEFUL FOR

Students studying fluid mechanics, engineering students focusing on buoyancy and stability, and educators looking for practical examples of buoyancy force calculations.

pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



I've attached the problem

I'm kind of lost as to how to even start this problem.


For part )

I think my first approach is to sum up forces in the vertical direction.
Which would yield F-W1-W2=ma=0

Where:
F=buoyancy force
W1=weight of submerged volume of oak
W2=weight of the steel thing.

W1=(Specific weight of oak)*(L-h)*A
(L-h)*A is essentially the volume of the submerged oak or the volume of the displaced fluid.

Can someone verify if this is the right approach?

Also, how do I find the specific weight of oak & steel given the specific gravity?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    35.3 KB · Views: 536
Physics news on Phys.org
pyroknife said:

Homework Statement



I've attached the problem

I'm kind of lost as to how to even start this problem.


For part )

I think my first approach is to sum up forces in the vertical direction.
Which would yield F-W1-W2=ma=0

Where:
F=buoyancy force
W1=weight of submerged volume of oak
W2=weight of the steel thing.
Why just the submerged part of the oak? Doesn't gravity work on the top part too?

For the rest you just need to review what the definition of specific gravity is and how it relates to weight.
 
rude man said:
Why just the submerged part of the oak? Doesn't gravity work on the top part too?

For the rest you just need to review what the definition of specific gravity is and how it relates to weight.

Oops I got that confused. It's the whole oak buoy, notjust the submerged part.

F is the weight of the displaced volume.
 
pyroknife said:
Oops I got that confused. It's the whole oak buoy, notjust the submerged part.

F is the weight of the displaced volume.

Correct, now use the given specific gravities to balance the forces and solve for h.
 
rude man said:
Correct, now use the given specific gravities to balance the forces and solve for h.

I'm trying to find the density from the SG. But what I'm confused about is in our book there's only specific gravity equations for liquids and gases. Oak and steel are solid materials. But in my textbook they used the same equation for liquid to solve for the density of oak and steel which is just (1000kg/m^3)*SG of oak or steel. Why is it that they assume oak and steel are liquids?
 
You are given the specific gravities for both the oak and the steel. That is all you need to get the weights of the buoy and the counterweight. Did you look up the definition of s.g.?
 
Yes, but I need to convert it to density or specific gravity before it can be much use.

Weight of oak is specific weight of oak multiplied by the volume of the oak. To get the specific weight of oak I need to multiply 0.71*1000*9.81
Where 9.81 m/s^2 is gravity
1000kg/m^3 is density
0.71 is the SG of oak

But I don't understand why I have to multiply by 1000.
 
pyroknife said:
Yes, but I need to convert it to density or specific gravity before it can be much use.

[/quote}
Huh? They are giving you the specific gravities of the wood, the sea water, the fresh water and the steel. That's what "S.G." stands for.

Weight of oak is specific weight of oak multiplied by the volume of the oak. To get the specific weight of oak I need to multiply 0.71*1000*9.81
Where 9.81 m/s^2 is gravity
1000kg/m^3 is density
0.71 is the SG of oak

But I don't understand why I have to multiply by 1000.

S.G. is a ratio. It is the ratio of the weight of a given substance in relation to the weight of the same volume of fresh water at 4 deg. C.

So 1 cc of wood weighs 0.71 times as much as 1 cc of water.

You need to multiply 0.71 by 1000 because 1 cubic meter of water has a mass of 1000 kg. You need to use the units your prof or whoever tells you to use, in this case the widely-used mks system (meter, kilogram, second). So you now know that 1 cubic meter of oak has a mass of 0.71 x 1000 = 710 kg.

Next, you need to convert mass to weight, and that's what the 9.81 number does. It converts 710 kg to the right number of Newtons, the unit of force or weight in the mks system.

You now have what you need to finish the exercise. Remember - everything must be in mks, which means buoyancy must also be expressed in Newtons.
 
rude man said:
S.G. is a ratio. It is the ratio of the weight of a given substance in relation to the weight of the same volume of fresh water at 4 deg. C.

So 1 cc of wood weighs 0.71 times as much as 1 cc of water.

You need to multiply 0.71 by 1000 because 1 cubic meter of water has a mass of 1000 kg. You need to use the units your prof or whoever tells you to use, in this case the widely-used mks system (meter, kilogram, second). So you now know that 1 cubic meter of oak has a mass of 0.71 x 1000 = 710 kg.

Next, you need to convert mass to weight, and that's what the 9.81 number does. It converts 710 kg to the right number of Newtons, the unit of force or weight in the mks system.

You now have what you need to finish the exercise. Remember - everything must be in mks, which means buoyancy must also be expressed in Newtons.
Thanks a bunch.

If you can check my work, that'd be awesome.

ƩF=Fb-Wo-Ws=ma=0, Ws=Fb-Wo
Fb=buoyancy force
Wo=weight of oak
Ws=weight of steel



Volume of immersed oak=.1*.1*(4-.6)=.034m^3
Vs=volume of steel=Ws/γs
γs=specific weight of steel

γ=specific volume of seawater=1.02*1000*9.81=10006.2 N/m^3
Fb=γ*(Volume of seawater)=10006.2*(.034+Ws/γs) << The parenthesis is the volume of the displaced fluid which is the volume of seawater taken up by the steel&oak
10006.2*(.034+Ws/(7.85*9.81*1000))=340.21+.13Ws

Plugging the above back into Ws=Fb-Wo
gives Ws=340.21+.13Ws-Wo=340.21+.13Ws-γo*Vo
where γo=specific weight of oak and Vo=volume of oak
Vo=.1*.1*4
γo=.71*1000*9.81

Ws=340.21+.13Ws-(.71*1000&9.81)(.1*.1*4)
Ws=70.81N
 
  • #10
pyroknife said:
Thanks a bunch.

If you can check my work, that'd be awesome.

ƩF=Fb-Wo-Ws=ma=0, Ws=Fb-Wo
Fb=buoyancy force
Wo=weight of oak
Ws=weight of steel
Volume of immersed oak=.1*.1*(4-.6)=.034m^3
So far, so good.
Vs=volume of steel=Ws/γs
You are not concerned with the volume of the steel. It's assumed zero or you'd have to compute the buoyancy of the steel also.
γs=specific weight of steel

γ=specific volume of seawater=1.02*1000*9.81=10006.2 N/m^3

Specific volume does not have units of N/m^3 so I'm not sure where you're going with this.

Frankly, I get dizzy trying to tie in s.g. in this problem. Most of us are used to dealing in density and I suggest you do the same. Density ρ = mass/volume.
The relation is ρ = 1000*(s.g.) kg/m3. So for example, ρ of sea water = 1000*1.02 = 1020 kg/m3. S.g. is not in absolute MKS units but is related to water at 4 deg C. That makes it an awkward parameter. Switch to density.

Now rewrite your first equation using density. Buoyancy Fb now becomes A(L-h)ρg. If you insist on using s.g., Fb = 1020A(L-h)g(s.g.).
 
  • #11
rude man said:
Specific volume does not have units of N/m^3 so I'm not sure where you're going with this.

Frankly, I get dizzy trying to tie in s.g. in this problem. Most of us are used to dealing in density and I suggest you do the same. Density ρ = mass/volume.
The relation is ρ = 1000*(s.g.) kg/m3. So for example, ρ of sea water = 1000*1.02 = 1020 kg/m3. S.g. is not in absolute MKS units but is related to water at 4 deg C. That makes it an awkward parameter. Switch to density.

Now rewrite your first equation using density. Buoyancy Fb now becomes A(L-h)ρg. If you insist on using s.g., Fb = 1020A(L-h)g(s.g.).

Hey sorry specific volume was typo. It's supposed to be specific weight

A general equation I used for specific weight=ρ*g = SG*1000*g which has the units N/m^3. It's just the way we do it in class, but it's essential the same as using density except multiplying it by the gravity.

The "Vs=volume of steel=Ws/γs" is the volume of seawater displaced by the steel. Don't I need to consider that since the force of buoyancy is the volume of the displaced seawater (=volume of steel&oak submerged in the seawater) multiplied by seawater's specific weight?
 
  • #12
i attached another image I saw in my book. It's a similar problem and they seemed to take into consideration the volume of the steel.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    20.9 KB · Views: 514
  • #13
pyroknife said:
i attached another image I saw in my book. It's a similar problem and they seemed to take into consideration the volume of the steel.

I have to eat crow! You're quite right, you have to include the volume of the steel.

And when I doI get the same answer you did! Congrats and sorry again for my blunder.

Now go ahead with part b?
 
  • #14
rude man said:
I have to eat crow! You're quite right, you have to include the volume of the steel.

And when I doI get the same answer you did! Congrats and sorry again for my blunder.

Now go ahead with part b?

Thanks for all the help by the way.

I actually had a question on part b that I was going to ask my professor.

Part b should be pretty simple, but when they refer to the spar buoy, does that include the steel piece as well or just the oak? It's my first time seeing the term spar buoy, but from google images it seems a spar buoy includes the metal piece as well.
 
  • #15
pyroknife said:
Thanks for all the help by the way.

I actually had a question on part b that I was going to ask my professor.

Part b should be pretty simple, but when they refer to the spar buoy, does that include the steel piece as well or just the oak? It's my first time seeing the term spar buoy, but from google images it seems a spar buoy includes the metal piece as well.

The idea is simply that the salt water is replaced by fresh water. That will cause h to change. The buoy and the steel are the same as in part a.
 
  • #16
Okay I just did it. The weight of the oak and steel remain unchanged.

Weight of oak = (.1*.1*4)(.71*1000*9.81)=278.6N
Total weight of oak and steel = 278.6+70.7=349.3N

Volume of steel = Ws/γs
= 70.7 / (7.87*9.81*1000)=9.162 * 10^-4 m^3

Volume of submerged oak = .1*.1*(4-h)

Fb=Volume of submerged liquid * (1.00*1000*9.81)=9810*volume of submerged liquid
= 9810 (.1*.1*(4-h) + 9.162 * 10^-4 ) = 349.3N
h=0.53 m or 53 cm

I think from this problem, I can assume that the same object placed in any kind of liquid would have the same buoyancy force? Since the weight remains unchanged.
 
  • #17
pyroknife said:
Okay I just did it. The weight of the oak and steel remain unchanged.

Weight of oak = (.1*.1*4)(.71*1000*9.81)=278.6N
Total weight of oak and steel = 278.6+70.7=349.3N

Volume of steel = Ws/γs
= 70.7 / (7.87*9.81*1000)=9.162 * 10^-4 m^3

Volume of submerged oak = .1*.1*(4-h)

Fb=Volume of submerged liquid * (1.00*1000*9.81)=9810*volume of submerged liquid
= 9810 (.1*.1*(4-h) + 9.162 * 10^-4 ) = 349.3N
h=0.53 m or 53 cm

I think from this problem, I can assume that the same object placed in any kind of liquid would have the same buoyancy force? Since the weight remains unchanged.


You got the right answer (h = 0.53 m) but your statement is only correct as long as the object doesn't sink.

If the object sinks, Fb is not = W since there is another force in play, to wit, the bottom of the lake or whatever pushing up on the object.

In all cases Euclid's statement is correct of course. Smart boy for a guy living 2500 years ago!
 
  • #18
Oh yeah, I completely forgot the other 2 cases. Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K