Does the Phase Factor in Wave Function Matter?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
does a phase factor (that can be represented by an imaginary exponential) in psi (the wave function) really matter? I am doing a problem and getting an answer that looks like sin[n(pi)x/a] when the answer is actually sin[n(pi)x/a-n(pi)]. I am just wondering at all if it makes any defference in the scheme of things. are both answers correct (because i know the probability will still be the same)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If n is an integer, then trigonometry shows that the two sins are the same..
 
pam said:
If n is an integer, then trigonometry shows that the two sins are the same..

up to a sign, as far as I remember trigonometry.
 
akhmeteli said:
up to a sign, as far as I remember trigonometry.

i understand that but are they both the same answer for a probability amplitude that fits the boundary conditions and where n in the form above is an integer?
 
captain said:
i understand that but are they both the same answer for a probability amplitude that fits the boundary conditions and where n in the form above is an integer?
You see, now you are supplying more details. Now your question sounds less philosophical and more mathematical. Why don't you just formulate the problem in its entirety, and then we might opine whether both answers are equally satisfactory.
 
captain said:
i understand that but are they both the same answer for a probability amplitude that fits the boundary conditions and where n in the form above is an integer?
If [tex]\psi[/tex] is a wave function, then [tex]e^{i\phi}\psi[/tex] is an equivalent wave function. In you case [tex]\phi=n\pi[/tex]. -sin kx is equivalent to +sin kx.