How to calculate a commutator from hydrogen atom radial equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the commutator from the radial equation of a hydrogen atom, specifically the term [ \frac{d}{d\rho}, \frac{1}{\rho}]. The correct calculation involves applying the product rule, resulting in \frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}\frac{1}{\rho}\psi=-\frac{1}{\rho^2}\psi+\frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial \rho}. Additionally, the confusion surrounding the complex conjugate of the derivative operator \frac{d}{d\rho} being \frac{-d}{d\rho} is clarified through the concept of Hermitian conjugates, emphasizing the importance of integration by parts in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the hydrogen atom model.
  • Familiarity with differential operators and their properties.
  • Knowledge of the product rule in calculus.
  • Concept of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the product rule in quantum mechanics, particularly in operator contexts.
  • Learn about Hermitian operators and their significance in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of complex conjugation in quantum mechanical operators.
  • Investigate the radial solutions of the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen atom.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying atomic physics, as well as educators teaching advanced topics in differential equations and operator theory.

DragonPetter
Messages
831
Reaction score
1
This is not homework, but is not general discussion, so not sure where this would go.

In class we were deriving with the radial equations of a hydrogen atom, and in one of the equations was the commutator term:

[tex]\left[ \frac{d}{d\rho}, \frac{1}{\rho}\right][/tex]


my attempt was:
[tex]\left[ \frac{d}{d\rho}, \frac{1}{\rho}\right][/tex]
=
[tex]\left(\frac{d}{d\rho} \cdot \frac{1}{\rho}\right) - - \left(\frac{1}{\rho} \cdot \frac{d}{d\rho}\right) = 2\left(\frac{d}{d\rho}\frac{1}{\rho}\right) = \frac{-2}{\rho^{2}}[/tex]


I know above is incorrect, but how is this commutator calculated? For some reason when I try, I get the wrong result, but I'm confused on exactly how to do it.


Also, I am confused on how to accept that the complex conjugate of [tex]\frac{d}{d\rho} = \frac{-d}{d\rho}[/tex].

Can anyone help clear this up for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you operate on a wave-function with the commutator

[tex]\left[ \frac{\partial}{\partial\rho}, \frac{1}{\rho}\right]=\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}\frac{1}{\rho}-\frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}[/tex]

The first term [itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}\frac{1}{\rho}[/itex] tell you to first multiply the wavefunction by [itex]\frac{1}{\rho}[/itex] and then take the partial derivative of the result with respect to [itex]\rho[/itex]...that means, you are taking the derivative of a product of two functions, and so you need to use the product rule:

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}\frac{1}{\rho}\psi=-\frac{1}{\rho^2}\psi+\frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial \rho}[/tex]

So, in operator form,

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho}\frac{1}{\rho}=-\frac{1}{\rho^2}+\frac{1}{\rho}\frac{\partial }{\partial \rho}[/tex]
 
DragonPetter said:
Also, I am confused on how to accept that the complex conjugate of [tex]\frac{d}{d\rho} = \frac{-d}{d\rho}[/tex].
You are probably thinking of the Hermitian conjugate or adjoint. Basically, for differential operators this amounts to "integration by parts" (or what a friend of mine would call the "inverse product rule"):

f(x)(dg/dx) = d(f(x)g(x))/dx - (df/dx)g(x)

So, when there is a funciton f(x) on the left and a function g(x) on the right, the derivative can "act to the right" on g(x), like normal, or it can "act to the left" on f(x) with an extra minus sign. However, you must take care to deal with the "surface terms" - the extra "total derivative" that appears on the RHS.

To relate this to complex conjugation:
The complex conjugate of an inner product is equal to the inner product in which the bra and ket have switched places. So, for differential operators, this causes the derivative to "act in the opposite direction".
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K