How to Calculate Expectation Value of Product State in a Potential-Free System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lindsayyyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product States
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of a product state for two particles in a potential-free system, specifically focusing on the expression for the distance squared between the two particles' positions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the representation of the particles' positions and their states, questioning how to apply the tensor product and the action of operators on the product state. There is uncertainty regarding the notation and the meaning of certain variables.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the tensor product structure and the independence of operations on different subspaces. Others express confusion about the notation used in the problem statement and seek clarification on how to proceed with the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential ambiguities in the problem statement, particularly regarding the notation for the position operator and the indices associated with the particles.

Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Homework Statement



I have to particles without a potential. The coordinates are r_1 and r_2 (for particle 1 and 2). Both have orthonormal states |↑> and |↓>. I shall show that the expectation value is the following, where as |↑↓> is a product state

d^2=\langle \uparrow \downarrow \mid (r_1-r_2)^2 \mid \uparrow \downarrow \rangle = \langle \uparrow \mid r^2 \mid \uparrow\rangle +\langle \downarrow \mid r^2 \mid \downarrow \rangle -2 \langle \uparrow \mid \vec r \mid \uparrow \rangle \langle \downarrow \mid \vec r \mid \downarrow \rangle



Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, my attempt so far isn't very good I think because I have many problems understanding this.

I think I can write my r_1 as:

\vec r_1 = \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} (\mid \uparrow \rangle + \mid \downarrow \rangle)
and the 2nd one as

\vec r_2 = \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} (\mid \uparrow \rangle + \mid \downarrow \rangle)

I can now to the tensor product, but that doesn't lead to anywhere ( I tried to use it to get my up down product state, but this term looks so complicated I can't use it to ease up my euqations)

Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, the tensor product is simply a product of two separate subspaces. So,
\mid \uparrow \downarrow \rangle can be more explicitly written as \mid \uparrow \rangle_{1}\mid\downarrow \rangle_{2}

Furthermore, r_{1} and r_{2} are really r \otimes I and I \otimes r respectively.

You just have to expand (r_1 - r_2)^2 and then "act them" on the appropriate subspaces.
 
thanks for your help so far.

yeah I know that (r1-r2)^2 is on of the binomial theorems. But I don't know actually how, let's say (r_1)^2 acts on ∣↑↓⟩. That's where I'm stuck.

edit: actually, I don't know what r even is (without the index). I thought it might have been a typing mistake by the task given, but you posted it aswell. Or did they just leave out the indices?
 
Lindsayyyy said:
edit: actually, I don't know what r even is (without the index). I thought it might have been a typing mistake by the task given, but you posted it aswell. Or did they just leave out the indices?
My best guess is what I posted earlier: r_{1} = r \otimes I and r_{2} = I \otimes r where I is identity. The subscripts 1 and 2 refer to the particle number.

Let me work out the trickier part explicitly: r_{1}r_{2} = r \otimes r
Lets act it on the state:
(\langle \uparrow \mid \otimes \langle \downarrow \mid)(r \otimes r)(\mid \uparrow \rangle \otimes \mid \downarrow \rangle)
Now, operations on each subspace are independent of each other ie.
(A \otimes B) (C \otimes D) = AC \otimes BD
So, the previous expression simplifies to
(\langle \uparrow \mid r \mid \uparrow \rangle) \otimes (\langle \downarrow \mid r \mid \downarrow \rangle)
But these are just c-numbers. So the tensor product becomes a normal product and we arrive at
\langle \uparrow \mid r \mid \uparrow \rangle\langle \downarrow \mid r \mid \downarrow \rangle
 
thanks for your help. I'm back home tomorrow then I will try to understand it a bit better. If I have problems again I will post here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K