How to calculate heat from enthelpy of reaction

  • Thread starter Thread starter CroSinus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the heat released from the combustion of acetylene (C2H2) using its enthalpy of reaction, which is -1299 kJ/mol. The user correctly converts 50 grams of C2H2 into moles, resulting in approximately 1.923 moles, and calculates the heat released as 1249.05 kJ. However, there is confusion regarding significant figures and the proper interpretation of the enthalpy unit, which should be clarified as per mole of the reaction as written. The correct representation of the heat released should be 2.5 MJ, considering significant digits. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clear communication regarding enthalpy values to avoid ambiguity in calculations.
CroSinus
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
1. Homework Statement

The chemical reaction is given:
2C2H2 + 5O2 -> 4CO2 + 2 H2O. ΔrH* = -1299 kJ / mol.
How much heat is released when 50 grams of C2H2 is burned?​

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I convert mass into moles.
M(C2H2) = 2*12+2 = 26 g/mol

n(C2H2) = m/M = 50 g / 26 gmol-1
n(C2H2) = 1,923 mol

Now I say: if 1299 kJ of heat is released when 2 moles of C2H2 are burned, then for 1.923 moles of the same thing I get 1249.05 kJ of heat (energy). Am I right?

Please be so king to comment on my answer! Let me know if I am right or wrong? Thank you very much.
CroSinus​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Logic looks OK, although you are told 50 g which suggests you should not list you answer with 6 significant digits.
 
Thank you for your swift answer. :-)

I do not know about digits. Should I write only 1249.1 kJ / mol?

The confusing thing is the unit: kJ per mol. Per mol of what?
 
Actually I have just checked and the enthalpy as listed is per mole of acetylene reacting. IMHO this is ambiguous and should be explained more precisely. Enthalpy can be given "per mole of a reacting substance" or "per mole of a reaction as written" (yes, technically there is no such thing as "mole of reaction", but it is nothing unusual to have it written like that). No wonder we were both wrong.

The answer should contain 2 significant digits, so (already correcting the mistake we did) 2.5×103 kJ, or just 2.5 MJ. Not that it matters much, but it is in general a mistake to present the number as if it was highly accurate when it is not.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
Thank you once again for dealing with my chemistry problems.

Yes, "per mole of a reaction as written", to my thinking, that is the right interpretation of the unit kJ / mol. If I want to calculate the amount of energy (heat) released in a reaction when ΔrH° is given, should I use the formula: q = ΔrH° × n(X) / stoichiometric coefficient (X)? Where X denotes either a chosen reactant, or a chosen product. I usually come across the formula: q = ΔrH° × n(X), but without the stoichiometric coefficient. So the complete formula should be written as: q = ΔrH° × n(X) / ν (X)?

Thanks,
CroSinus
 
CroSinus said:
Yes, "per mole of a reaction as written", to my thinking, that is the right interpretation of the unit kJ / mol.

That's the problem: it is not necessarily right. Giving enthalpy of combustion per mole of acetylene completely burned is perfectly valid and unambiguous, as long as it is clearly stated.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top