How to calculate mass of closed Universe?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter johne1618
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Mass Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the total mass of a closed Universe, specifically focusing on the integration of mass density over a 3-sphere. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and notation involved in this calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes an integral for calculating the mass of a closed Universe, suggesting that the total mass can be expressed as M = R(t)^3 ρ ∫₀¹ 4πr² (dr/√(1-r²)), where R(t) is the radius of the Universe at time t.
  • Another participant points out a potential issue with the notation, stating that if R is a function of time, the placement of the cube may be incorrect, asserting that R(t)^3 ≠ R^3(t).
  • A later reply seeks clarification on the difference between R(t)^3 and R^3(t), indicating that the former applies the cube to the entire function while the latter applies it to the output of the function.
  • Participants discuss the implications of notation and clarity in mathematical expressions, emphasizing that misinterpretation can occur in more complex equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correct formulation of the mass calculation, and participants express differing views on the notation and its implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of clear notation in mathematical expressions, especially when dealing with functions of time. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps or assumptions involved in the integral.

johne1618
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
How does one integrate the mass density over a closed Universe (a 3-sphere?) to obtain the total mass of that Universe?

Is this the correct integral?

<br /> M = R(t)^3 \rho\int_0^1 4 \pi r^2 \frac{dr}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}<br />

where R(t) is the radius of the Universe at cosmological time t.

By making the substitution r=\sin \chi one finds that the above integral gives:

<br /> M = \pi^2 R(t)^3 \rho.<br />

According to wikipedia the hyperarea of a 3-sphere is 2\pi^2 R^3 so I'm out by a factor of two.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
The former applies the cube to the brackets, the latter applies the cube to the function.
##R(t)^3=Rt^3##
##R^3(t)=\big [ R(t)\big ]^3##

compare: ##\cos(kx)^3## with ##\cos^3(kx)##
Since it is also valid to write ##\cos kx## the first version does not make it clear what is intended.
Is it the cosine of the cube of a product or the cube of the cosine of a product? OP only had one variable in the brackets, which gives notice to the reader.

... its really just a notation foible.
I don't think anyone would get confused in such a small equation but in big long multiline equations it gets easier to be misread.
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
The former applies the cube to the brackets, the latter applies the cube to the function.
##R(t)^3=Rt^3##
##R^3(t)=\big [ R(t)\big ]^3##

compare: ##\cos(kx)^3## with ##\cos^3(kx)##
Since it is also valid to write ##\cos kx## the first version does not make it clear what is intended.
Is it the cosine of the cube of a product or the cube of the cosine of a product? OP only had one variable in the brackets, which gives notice to the reader.

... its really just a notation foible.
I don't think anyone would get confused in such a small equation but in big long multiline equations it gets easier to be misread.

I understand, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K