How to Calculate Moment of Inertia for Composite Objects?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for composite objects, specifically a circle with an inscribed square and vice versa. Participants confirm that the moment of inertia of the composite shape can be determined by subtracting the moment of inertia of the inner shape from that of the outer shape, expressed as I_total = I_square - I_circle. The relevant formulae include M = (4 - π)D R^2 for mass calculations and I_c = (1/2)M_c R^2 for the circle's moment of inertia. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the individual masses and densities of the shapes involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia calculations
  • Familiarity with composite shapes in physics
  • Knowledge of basic geometry and area calculations
  • Proficiency in applying density and mass relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment of inertia for composite shapes
  • Learn about the properties of homogeneous materials in physics
  • Explore advanced applications of the parallel axis theorem
  • Investigate the implications of density variations in composite objects
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, engineers working on mechanical systems, and anyone interested in the principles of rotational dynamics and composite object analysis.

Gmaximus
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
How would you find the moment of inertia of a circle with a square inscribed in it, or vice versa?

I thought about subtracting the inner object's I from the outer's, but that didn't seem to make sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Done properly, that would work. For example: The rotational inertia of a circle with a square cut out equals the rotational inertia of the circle minus the rotational inertia of the square.
 
My textbook's example seems to use the equation M=(4-Pi)DR^2, where D is density in the example with the circle cut out of a sqaure, but i don't follow. Wouldn't it just be:

Itotal=Isquare-Icircle

But that leaves you with some problems... how do you find the indivual mass of each?
 
If the material is homogeneous, the density of the square cut out will equal that of the circle (its been quite a while since I did this, so forgive me if you find an inaccuracy in my explanation...do correct it though). You can compute the square and circle's moments of inertia separately and subtract using the idea you mentioned yourself and Doc Al's post. The individual mass can be calculated using the idea mentioned in the first line of this post.
 
But, the way i see it, the square has an area of 4r^2, and the circle has an area of pir^2
 
square minus circle

Gmaximus said:
But, the way i see it, the square has an area of 4r^2, and the circle has an area of pir^2
That would be the case for a square (of side 2r) with a circle (of radius r) cut out. In which case, I = I_{square} - I_{circle}.
 
With random numbers, (R=2 and M=2), i got: I=7.57
 
I don't believe that's right, because i kind of ad libbed a step where i used the relation i mentioned before. i'd show my work but its very long.



Here's how it worked:
M_s=Massofsqaure
I_s=1/6*M_S(2R)^2
M_s=M+M_c
M_c=(4-pi)R^2


That last part I am unsure of.
 
Gmaximus said:
Here's how it worked:
M_s=Massofsqaure
I_s=1/6*M_S(2R)^2
OK.
M_s=M+M_c
Right, where M is the mass of the piece in question (square - circle).
M_c=(4-pi)R^2
No. If I understand you properly, that should be M = (4 - \pi) D R^2, where D is density and R is the radius of the circle.

What mass are you actually given? And what about I_c?
 
  • #10
I just forgot to add what i put for I_c
It was:

I_c=1/2*M_c*R^2[/tex]

The example in the textbook derives it in a general form, with mass M, and Radius R, and a constant density. I Tried it with M=2 and R=2 And got the above number.
 
  • #11
Gmaximus said:
I_c=1/2*M_c*R^2
Right.
The example in the textbook derives it in a general form, with mass M, and Radius R, and a constant density. I Tried it with M=2 and R=2 And got the above number.
Show your work so we can check it over.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
52
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K