How to calculate stopping potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter 6021023
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the stopping potential in a photoelectric experiment at two wavelengths: 400 nm and 600 nm. The stopping potential at 400 nm is given as 0.9V, but confusion arises when attempting to calculate the stopping potential for 600 nm. Participants clarify that the equations used must correctly interpret wavelength as frequency, emphasizing the importance of understanding the symbols involved, such as Planck's constant and the work function. The initial calculations lead to incorrect results, highlighting the need for careful application of the relevant equations. The conversation underscores the necessity of accurately converting wavelengths to frequencies to derive the correct stopping potential.
6021023
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A photoelectic experiment was performed at two different wavelengths of light: 400 nm and 600 nm. The stopping potential ("push back" voltage) at 400 nm s 0.9V. What is the stopping potential at 600 nm


Homework Equations


eV = h(v - v0)



The Attempt at a Solution


eV/h = v - v0
v0 = v - eV/h
v0 = 400 *10^-9 - (1.602*10^-19)(0.9)/(6.6*10^-34)
v0 = -2.18*10^14

V = h(v - v0)/e
V = (6.6*10^-34)(600*10^-9 - -2.18*10^14)/(1.602*10^-19)
V = 0.9

But this can't be right, since that is the stopping potential for a wavelength of 400nm. The stopping potential should be higher.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure I understand the symbols in your "relevant equation". Could you please identify them one by one? Thanks.
 
e is the charge of an electron.
V is the stopping potential
h is Plancks constant
v is the frequency
v0 is also a frequency
 
I understand now. To begin with, what you call vo is related to the work function and cannot be negative. Your problem is that you confused wavelength with frequency. When you are given 400 nm and 600 nm, these are wavelengths not frequencies. You need to learn to interpret the given numbers in terms of your equations and not just plug in without second thought.
 
That makes sense, but when I tried it out using frequency instead of wavelength, I get a huge number for v0. Maybe that's ok, but then when I try to use that to solve for V, I get a negative number.
 
Show what you did and what you got. Maybe I can find something wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K