How to calculate stopping potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter 6021023
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a photoelectric experiment involving the calculation of stopping potential at different wavelengths of light, specifically 400 nm and 600 nm. The original poster attempts to determine the stopping potential at 600 nm based on the stopping potential observed at 400 nm.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between wavelength and frequency, questioning the original poster's interpretation of variables in the relevant equation. There is an exploration of the implications of using wavelength versus frequency in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the symbols used in the equations and have pointed out potential misunderstandings related to the work function and the nature of the variables. The conversation is ongoing, with attempts to reconcile the original poster's calculations with the correct interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the conversion between wavelength and frequency, as well as the implications of negative values in the calculations. The original poster's calculations are based on assumptions that may need reevaluation.

6021023
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A photoelectic experiment was performed at two different wavelengths of light: 400 nm and 600 nm. The stopping potential ("push back" voltage) at 400 nm s 0.9V. What is the stopping potential at 600 nm


Homework Equations


eV = h(v - v0)



The Attempt at a Solution


eV/h = v - v0
v0 = v - eV/h
v0 = 400 *10^-9 - (1.602*10^-19)(0.9)/(6.6*10^-34)
v0 = -2.18*10^14

V = h(v - v0)/e
V = (6.6*10^-34)(600*10^-9 - -2.18*10^14)/(1.602*10^-19)
V = 0.9

But this can't be right, since that is the stopping potential for a wavelength of 400nm. The stopping potential should be higher.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure I understand the symbols in your "relevant equation". Could you please identify them one by one? Thanks.
 
e is the charge of an electron.
V is the stopping potential
h is Plancks constant
v is the frequency
v0 is also a frequency
 
I understand now. To begin with, what you call vo is related to the work function and cannot be negative. Your problem is that you confused wavelength with frequency. When you are given 400 nm and 600 nm, these are wavelengths not frequencies. You need to learn to interpret the given numbers in terms of your equations and not just plug in without second thought.
 
That makes sense, but when I tried it out using frequency instead of wavelength, I get a huge number for v0. Maybe that's ok, but then when I try to use that to solve for V, I get a negative number.
 
Show what you did and what you got. Maybe I can find something wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K