Undergrad How to calculate the Lamb Shift in Hydrogen?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Lamb Shift in hydrogen, emphasizing the need to consider both QED Feynman diagrams and the proton's charge distribution for precise measurements. The Lamb Shift is influenced by the proton's size and its electrical attraction to electrons, which affects binding energy. When exciting electrons in hydrogen gas with a laser, the majority of hydrogen remains electrically neutral, with minimal formation of negatively charged ions or protons. The precision required for measuring the Lamb Shift necessitates a detailed understanding of these interactions. Overall, the calculation involves complex quantum effects rather than simple ionization processes.
zincshow
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
This recent article (https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-finally-nail-the-protons-size-and-hope-dies-20190911/) on the size of the proton left me with a couple of confusing questions:

1/ Is the amount of the lamb shift completely determined by Feynman diagrams or is "it spends part of its time inside the proton .. As a result, the amount of electrical attraction between the two decreases, reducing the energy that binds the atom together." calculated in some other manner?

2/ "By firing a laser into a cloud of hydrogen gas and exciting electrons to different levels", does most of the hydrogen stay electrically neutral or do you have a lot of H¯, H¯¯, and H⁺ flying around in addition to neutral hydrogen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ad 1). The precision of the Lamb shift you need here unfortunately makes it necessary to not only consider QED Feynman diagrams but also to take into account the charge-distribution of the proton. After all you want to measure precisely one of its properties, namely the charge radius of the proton.

ad 2). The Lambshift is about tiny excitations of the hydrogen state, it's not about ionizing the hydrogen atom or looking at negatively charged ions (i.e., proton+2 or more electrons).
 
  • Like
Likes MisterX
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
26K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
165K
Replies
23
Views
12K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K