How to calculate the nuclear size from the strong nuclear force?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the size of nucleons, specifically protons, by analyzing the balance between the repulsive electric force and the attractive strong nuclear force. Participants explore theoretical frameworks, empirical data, and the complexities of modeling nuclear interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that evaluating the size of nucleons through the equilibrium of forces is a standard topic in nuclear physics.
  • One participant describes the strong nuclear force as having a repulsive core that maintains a constant distance between nucleons, citing specific distances and force magnitudes.
  • Another participant proposes using the Yukawa potential to calculate the nuclear force, questioning the value of the coupling constant $g$.
  • A counterpoint is raised that the Yukawa potential does not account for the repulsive core, indicating that the early model of nuclear force based solely on pion exchange is inaccurate.
  • Historical context is provided regarding Rutherford's discovery of the nuclear Coulomb force and its implications for understanding nuclear size, referencing specific literature and scattering experiments.
  • Questions are posed about whether the strong force potential can be derived analytically from quantum field theory (QFT), with some participants asserting that only semi-empirical formulas exist due to the non-perturbative nature of quantum chromodynamics (QCD).
  • One participant expresses a desire to understand the physical constants that influence nuclear size, noting the complexity of the strong force compared to the Coulomb potential.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of the Yukawa potential and the derivation of the nuclear force from QFT. There is no consensus on the best approach to calculate nuclear size or the underlying physical constants involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of an exact analytical expression for the nucleon-nucleon force from QCD and the reliance on empirical data, which may obscure fundamental physical insights.

Aidyan
Messages
182
Reaction score
14
I suppose that the evaluation of the size of a proton and of nucleons calculating the equilibrium between the repulsive electric force and the attracting strong nuclear force is a standard nuclear physics topic, but I couldn't find it. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The nuclear force has a strong repulsive core that tends to keeps nucleons a constant distance apart. See http://webs.mn.catholic.edu.au/physics/emery/hsc_quanta_quarks.htmfor an illustration. Quoting:

The main properties of the strong nuclear force are:

At typical nucleon separation (1.3 x 10-15m) it is a very strong attractive force (104 N).

At much smaller separations between nucleons the force is very powerfully repulsive.

Beyond about 1.3 x 10-15m separation, the force quickly dies off to zero. Thus, the strong nuclear force is a very short-range force.

The much smaller Coulomb force between protons has a much larger range and becomes the only significant force between protons when their separation exceeds about 2.5 x 10-15m.

The strong nuclear force is not connected with charge. Proton-proton, proton-neutron and neutron-neutron forces are the same. (The force between protons, however, must always be modified by the Coulomb repulsion between them.)
 
Ok, this is the qualitative description. But for the calculation, as I understand it, one has to obtain the force field from the Yukawa potential:

V(r)=-g^2 \, \frac{e^{-mcr/\hbar}}{r}

with m the mass of the strong force mediating pion, and then equate with the Coulomb force. Everyone tells $g$ is some constant without further clarification. What is its value?
 
Nope. Did you look at the picture? The Yukawa potential has no repulsive core. The idea that the nuclear force was simply due to the exchange of pions was an early guess which turned out to be inaccurate.
 
Rutherford first discovered that the nuclear Coulomb force was not 1/r2 by scattering alpha particles off of thin foils (gold). Look in particular at the impact parameter b(θ) in the Coulomb scattering cross section, and the discussion on "calculating nuclear size" in

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutherford_scattering

This section from Blatt and Weisskopf Theoretical Nuclear Physics (pages 86 - 94)

http://books.google.com/books?id=R3...ge&q=neutron proton scattering length&f=false

discusses low energy proton proton scattering (pages 86 - 94), including nuclear-Coulomb destructive interference observed in the differential cross section, showing that the nuclear force is attractive.
 
Ok. But is the precise strong force potential inferred only by fitting the experimental data of cross sections? There is no analytic expression derived from QFT for the nuclear force? Even not for a single proton/neutron?
 
Aidyan said:
There is no analytic expression derived from QFT for the nuclear force? Even not for a single proton/neutron?

Nope. The best you can get are semi-empirical formulas. But you can't start from QCD and get an exact solution for the nucleon-nucleon force. It's highly non perturbative, so you would have to go to the lattice.
 
Ok, thanks so far. The problem is that these empirical data hide the real physical information. In fact, I would like to understand from what kind of physical constants depends the nucleus size? For the Coulomb potential it is easy, but when it comes to the strong force interaction it isn't clear to me. I suppose the speed of light, Planck's constant, etc. (pion mass?) Did someone elaborate on this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K