How to Calculate the Power Output of a Waterfall Generator

  • Thread starter Thread starter pooface
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Work
Click For Summary
To calculate the power output of a waterfall generator, the height of the waterfall (85 ft) and the flow rate (3000 cubic ft/sec) must be converted to SI units, resulting in 25.91 m and 914.4 cubic meters/sec, respectively. The weight of the water is calculated using the density of water, yielding approximately 8.97 MN. The potential energy is then determined to be 232.42 MJ, leading to a power input of 232.42 megawatts. With an overall efficiency of 22%, the output power can be calculated. The discussion also included tips on converting cubic feet to cubic meters, emphasizing the utility of online conversion tools.
pooface
Messages
207
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A waterfall is 85ft high, and 3000 cubic ft/sec flow over it driving a water wheel connected to an electric generator. If the overall efficiency is 22%, how many kilowatts does the generator develop?

Homework Equations


density of water =1000kg/cubic meter
P.E. = mgh
weight=density*g*volume

The Attempt at a Solution


Firstly convert to SI units.
85ft = 25.91m
3000 cubicft/sec = 914.4 cubic meter/sec

weight of the water being applied = (1000)(9.81)(914.4)
= 8.97 MN

P.E.=(8.97 MN)(25.91m)
=232.42 MJ
power in = 232.42 MJ /1sec = 232.42 megawatts

eff =0.22

0.22 = POUT/232.42 MW

Are my steps correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3000 cubicft/sec = 914.4 cubic meter/sec

I'm getting 3000 cubicft/sec = 84.95 cubic m/s

other than this, everything looks right to me. be sure to convert to kW when you finish...
 
how do you do a conversion such as 3000 cubic ft to cubic meter?

Yea, I realized i just did a ft-m conversion instead of cubic ft to cubic meter (a function on my calc).
 
pooface said:
how do you do a conversion such as 3000 cubic ft to cubic meter?

Yea, I realized i just did a ft-m conversion instead of cubic ft to cubic meter (a function on my calc).

I actually just used google.com. I typed in 3000 ft^3 and it automatically converted it.

But we can do it this way:

we know that 1 ft = 0.3048m

(1ft)^3 = (0.3048m)^3

so 1ft^3 = 0.0283168466 m^3

so 3000 ft^3 = 84.95 m^3
 
amazing...thanks a lot learningphysics. You are truly an asset to this board. I have another test this friday. Hope I do well.
 
pooface said:
amazing...thanks a lot learningphysics. You are truly an asset to this board. I have another test this friday. Hope I do well.

thanks so much. I appreciate it! good luck on your test! you'll do great!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
22K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K