How to Calculate the Resultant Vector from Multiple Displacement Vectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LuvIz4ever
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the resultant vector from multiple displacement vectors: A (2 km east), B (3.75 km north), C (2.5 km west), and D (3 km south). The resultant vector is determined by first resolving the east-west and north-south components. The net displacement is 0.5 km west and 0.75 km north, leading to a resultant vector that can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem, yielding a magnitude of approximately 0.9 km at an angle relative to west.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector addition
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem
  • Basic knowledge of displacement vectors
  • Ability to interpret vector diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector addition techniques in physics
  • Learn how to create and interpret vector diagrams
  • Explore the application of the Pythagorean theorem in physics problems
  • Investigate the concept of resultant vectors and their significance
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those learning about vectors and displacement, as well as educators seeking to explain vector addition concepts effectively.

LuvIz4ever
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am a beginner in physiscs and i am soo confused...

Prob:
Diaplacement vectorA points due east and has a magnitude of 2 km and dissplacement vector B points due north and has a magnitude of 3.75km. Displacement vector C points due west and has a magnitude of 2.5 km and displacement vector d points due south with a magnitude of 3 km. Find the magnitude and direction ( in respect to west) of the resultant vector a+b+c+d
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make a diagram, draw vectors as arrows. Try to make their arrows proportional to their magnitude.

You could even think of it this way,if you go east 2km, and then west 2.5 km, than you know you went west .5 km, and then north 3.75, south 3km, therefore in total you went west .5km and north .75 km.

Now, you can even use the pythagorean theorem to solve this...

Next time, PLEASE try to say what you tried to do, what didn't work, and why you are confused. It would help greatly.
 
Ok Thank you! so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K