How to Calculate Watt: Understanding the Basics

  • Thread starter Thread starter skaunejohan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Watt
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating wattage in the context of a car's acceleration. The original poster shares their calculations involving acceleration, work, and kinetic energy, expressing a desire to understand the relationship between these concepts and how to calculate wattage.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate acceleration and work but questions the validity of their approach to finding wattage. Some participants clarify the correct units for acceleration and challenge the formula used for work, suggesting the use of kinetic energy instead.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying concepts and correcting misunderstandings. The original poster has received guidance on calculating kinetic energy and is exploring the implications of their calculations. There is a productive exchange of ideas, with some participants providing corrections and suggestions.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that this is a hobby project and expresses uncertainty about their mathematical skills. There are discussions about the correct formulas and units, as well as the need for further clarification on kinetic energy calculations.

skaunejohan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
ive always been interested in calculations, so i want to try to calculate watt but I am stuck

bear in mind this is a pure hobby for me and i am far from a math genious



in this example i use a car

here is how far i have come

it accelerates from 22.2m/s to 33.3 m/s in 7 seconds
to calculate acceleration you do like this

highest speed-lowest/time 33.3-22.2=11.1 11.1/7 is almost 1.58

giving the car acceleration of 1.58m/s^2 so far so good
-----------------------------------------------------------

next is calculating work
work= mass*acceleration^2

so if the car is 1200kg(Newton)

then we take 1200* (1.58*1.58) = 2996 joules (this is correct i hope)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

and this is where i get stuck because the formulas i find state that watt=work/time

2996joules/7sec is obviously wrong...



can anybody help me?

cheers/Johan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
skaunejohan said:
in this example i use a car

here is how far i have come

it accelerates from 22.2m/s to 33.3 m/s in 7 seconds
to calculate acceleration you do like this

highest speed-lowest/time 33.3-22.2=11.1 11.1/7 is almost 1.58

giving the car acceleration of 1.58m/s so far so good
OK, that's the average acceleration. The units should be m/s², not m/s. (But you don't really need the acceleration to find the work done.)
-----------------------------------------------------------

next is calculating work
work= mass*acceleration^2
This is incorrect. (Note that that quantity does not have the correct units for work/energy.)

To calculate the work done, find the change in kinetic energy. Kinetic energy = ½mv².
 
skaunejohan said:
ive always been interested in calculations, so i want to try to calculate watt but I am stuck

bear in mind this is a pure hobby for me and i am far from a math genious



in this example i use a car

here is how far i have come

it accelerates from 22.2m/s to 33.3 m/s in 7 seconds
to calculate acceleration you do like this

highest speed-lowest/time 33.3-22.2=11.1 11.1/7 is almost 1.58

giving the car acceleration of 1.58m/s so far so good
-----------------------------------------------------------

next is calculating work
work= mass*acceleration^2

so if the car is 1200kg(Newton)

then we take 1200* (1.58*1.58) = 2996 joules (this is correct i hope)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

and this is where i get stuck because the formulas i find state that watt=work/time

2996joules/7sec is obviously wrong...



can anybody help me?

cheers/Johan

A couple issues. First the acceleration would be 1.58m/s^2. Velocity has units of m/s and acceleration has units of m/s^2.

Next, I do not think this is correct: "work= mass*acceleration^2" Where did you get that?

Force = mass*acceleration (F=ma), and work = Force*distance.

Does that help?
 
Doc Al said:
OK, that's the average acceleration. The units should be m/s², not m/s. (But you don't really need the acceleration to find the work done.)

This is incorrect. (Note that that quantity does not have the correct units for work/energy.)

To calculate the work done, find the change in kinetic energy. Kinetic energy = ½mv².


sorry my mistake, like i stated above I am only doing this as a hobby, i will alter the acceleration immediatley

thanks for the fast reply, I am sorry but i have no idea how to calculate the kinetic energy can you help me?
 
berkeman said:
A couple issues. First the acceleration would be 1.58m/s^2. Velocity has units of m/s and acceleration has units of m/s^2.

Next, I do not think this is correct: "work= mass*acceleration^2" Where did you get that?

Force = mass*acceleration (F=ma), and work = Force*distance.

Does that help?

ahh now i see one of the problems in my calculation

it stated work=N*m/s^2



so force should be 1200*1.58? (1896watt?)





is it possible to calculate distance from the starting speed of 22.2m/s and finish speed of 33.3m/s over 7sec

sounds over-complicated...

thanks for the fast reply
 
skaunejohan said:
im sorry but i have no idea how to calculate the kinetic energy can you help me?

Doc Al said:
Kinetic energy = ½mv².
You have the mass (m) and the speed (v). Calculate the initial and final kinetic energy, then find the change.
 
Doc Al said:
You have the mass (m) and the speed (v). Calculate the initial and final kinetic energy, then find the change.

ahhh :)

starting kinetic 0,5*1200*(22.2*22.2)= 295704 joules

ending kinetic 0.5*1200*(33.3*33.3)= 665334 joules

369630 joules

(just thinking loud now)
369.6/7=53kw sounds very reasonable as a medium power

is it really that simple?

cheers/Johan
 
Yes, it's that simple.
 
thanks a lot :) this forum is great!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K