MHB How to change the subject when exponential is involved

AI Thread Summary
Making Pr(x) the subject of the equation T = S [(1-Pr(x))^N] + Pr(x) is challenging, especially since N is not necessarily an integer. For N ≥ 5, the equation becomes a polynomial of at least the fifth degree, which typically lacks analytic solutions. Numerical solutions and approximations are likely necessary to find Pr(x). Alternatively, the equation can be rearranged to involve the Lambert W function, although this may not be practical for most calculators. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the complexity of solving for Pr(x) in this context.
MWD02
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
It's been a long time since I've worried about this - but could someone help me make Pr(x) the subject (I can't remember if it's possible, if it's not, I'd love a brief explanation):

T = S [(1-Pr(x))^N] + Pr(x)

Thanks in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I should mention N isn't necessarily an integer.
 
MWD02 said:
It's been a long time since I've worried about this - but could someone help me make Pr(x) the subject (I can't remember if it's possible, if it's not, I'd love a brief explanation):

T = S [(1-Pr(x))^N] + Pr(x)

Thanks in advance!

MWD02 said:
Sorry, I should mention N isn't necessarily an integer.

Hi MWD02! Welcome to MHB! ;)

Even if $N$ would be an integer, for $N\ge 5$ this is a polynomial of at least the 5th degree with at least 3 terms, for which there are typically no 'analytic' solutions.
So I think we're stuck with numerical solutions, meaning we have to make approximations. (Worried)
 
Ah I was afraid someone would use the word "approximations"!... Oh well, I'll see what I can do for my particular problem.

Thanks very much for the reply! :D
 
Well, you probably could (I won't try to do it) rearrange the equation so the solution can be written in terms of the "Lambert W function" (defined as the inverse function to f(x)= xe^x) but then your calculator probably does not have a "W function" key!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top