MHB How to change the subject when exponential is involved

Click For Summary
Making Pr(x) the subject of the equation T = S [(1-Pr(x))^N] + Pr(x) is challenging, especially since N is not necessarily an integer. For N ≥ 5, the equation becomes a polynomial of at least the fifth degree, which typically lacks analytic solutions. Numerical solutions and approximations are likely necessary to find Pr(x). Alternatively, the equation can be rearranged to involve the Lambert W function, although this may not be practical for most calculators. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the complexity of solving for Pr(x) in this context.
MWD02
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
It's been a long time since I've worried about this - but could someone help me make Pr(x) the subject (I can't remember if it's possible, if it's not, I'd love a brief explanation):

T = S [(1-Pr(x))^N] + Pr(x)

Thanks in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I should mention N isn't necessarily an integer.
 
MWD02 said:
It's been a long time since I've worried about this - but could someone help me make Pr(x) the subject (I can't remember if it's possible, if it's not, I'd love a brief explanation):

T = S [(1-Pr(x))^N] + Pr(x)

Thanks in advance!

MWD02 said:
Sorry, I should mention N isn't necessarily an integer.

Hi MWD02! Welcome to MHB! ;)

Even if $N$ would be an integer, for $N\ge 5$ this is a polynomial of at least the 5th degree with at least 3 terms, for which there are typically no 'analytic' solutions.
So I think we're stuck with numerical solutions, meaning we have to make approximations. (Worried)
 
Ah I was afraid someone would use the word "approximations"!... Oh well, I'll see what I can do for my particular problem.

Thanks very much for the reply! :D
 
Well, you probably could (I won't try to do it) rearrange the equation so the solution can be written in terms of the "Lambert W function" (defined as the inverse function to f(x)= xe^x) but then your calculator probably does not have a "W function" key!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K