How to choose Gaussian surface

Click For Summary
A spherical surface is chosen for a point charge in electric field calculations because it maintains equal distance from the charge at all points, ensuring a uniform electric field. This symmetry simplifies calculations, as opposed to a cube where distances vary, complicating the analysis. For an infinitely long charged sheet, a cylindrical surface is preferred due to its symmetry, allowing for straightforward application of Gauss's Law. The electric field can be easily determined from the symmetry of the problem, which dictates that the field points radially outward. In more complex scenarios, where symmetry is not apparent, differential equations must be used to find the electric field.
Pushpam Singh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1 Why do we choose a spherical surface as gaussian surface for a point charge to calculate electric field?

In my view, the reason may be
i. If we take the point charge at centre, each point of spherical surface will be at same distance from the point charge and thus is equivalent.Thus electric field (perpendicular to the surface ) at every point of the surface will be equivalent .

If we take other surface like cube , the distance between the point charge and every point of cube will be different.Then the calculation becomes hard.

2 Why do we choose a cylinderical surface for a infitely long char?ged sheet , why not other closed surface e.g. cube?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is all about symmetry. You can calculate the electric field for such highly symmetric situations with help of the integral form of Gauß's Law, because you can guess, how it should look like from the symmetry of the problem.

For a point charge, everything is radially symmetric, and thus the electric field must point radially out from the charge, i.e., you must have
\vec{E}(\vec{x})=E_r(r) \frac{\vec{x}}{r},
where r=|\vec{x}|. Then you choose a sphere around the charge, because this gives you the missing component E_r(r). According to Gauß's Law you have (in Heaviside-Lorentz units)
Q=\int_{S_r} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{E}=4 \pi r^2 E_r(r)\; \Rightarrow \; E_r(r)=\frac{Q}{4 \pi r^2}.
thus you get the Coulomb field as expected
\vec{E}=\frac{Q}{4 \pi r^3} \vec{x}.

For the infinite line charge the same idea holds. Due to symmetry the field must point radially out from the line, and you can use a cylinder as the surface in Gauß's Law.

For more complicated situations, of course, you cannot guess the field's direction so easily anymore, and then you must apply the local form of the laws and integrate the corresponding differential equations.
 
Pushpam Singh said:
2 Why do we choose a cylinderical surface for a infitely long char?ged sheet , why not other closed surface e.g. cube?
Just about any shape would work as long as the surfaces were parallel and perpendicular to the field. A cube would work fine, as long you oriented it correctly. (A cube at some odd angle to the sheet wouldn't work.)
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
725
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K